2012Cambridge University Press eBooksRequires access

Transfer pricing disputes in the United Kingdom

Ian Roxan

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

Introduction The experience of the United Kingdom in transfer pricing disputes is striking. On the one hand, due to the age of its income tax system, the United Kingdom has some of the earliest legislation that can be seen to have been addressed against transfer pricing. On the other hand, despite now having very modern legislation on transfer pricing, there are very few recorded transfer pricing disputes. Until the introduction of the modern rules in 1999, this appears to have been due to the strong administrative role played by the Inland Revenue as the tax authority at the time. To some extent, a similar attitude, accepting administrative contacts as the appropriate means to resolve transfer pricing disputes, appears to have persisted since then. However, there are signs that taxpayers are now more willing to litigate transfer pricing disputes, although it seems that cases are still mostly resolved before any judicial hearing.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Introduction The experience of the United Kingdom in transfer pricing disputes is striking. On the one hand, due to the age of its income tax system, the United Kingdom has some of the earliest legislation that can be seen to have been addressed against transfer pricing. On the other hand, despite now having very modern legislation on transfer pricing, there are very few recorded transfer pricing disputes. Until the introduction of the modern rules in 1999, this appears to have been due to the strong administrative role played by the Inland Revenue as the tax authority at the time. To some extent, a similar attitude, accepting administrative contacts as the appropriate means to resolve transfer pricing disputes, appears to have persisted since then. However, there are signs that taxpayers are now more willing to litigate transfer pricing disputes, although it seems that cases are still mostly resolved before any judicial hearing.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Introduction The experience of the United Kingdom in transfer pricing disputes is striking. On the one hand, due to the age of its income tax system, the United Kingdom has some of the earliest legislation that can be seen to have been addressed against transfer pricing. On the other hand, despite now having very modern legislation on transfer pricing, there are very few recorded transfer pricing disputes. Until the introduction of the modern rules in 1999, this appears to have been due to the strong administrative role played by the Inland Revenue as the tax authority at the time. To some extent, a similar attitude, accepting administrative contacts as the appropriate means to resolve transfer pricing disputes, appears to have persisted since then. However, there are signs that taxpayers are now more willing to litigate transfer pricing disputes, although it seems that cases are still mostly resolved before any judicial hearing.

Key concepts: Transfer pricing, Legislation, Kingdom, Revenue, Internal revenue, Tax revenue, Business, Economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Transfer pricing disputes in the United Kingdom — Research Paper | ScholarLens