1988ITE journalRequires access

LOCAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING: WHERE ARE WE?

C M Hanchey, Stephen E. Meyer

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

A survey (by 2-page questionnaire) is reported of cities and counties in Tennessee. The survey attempted to determine the following: who makes decisions on traffic control; how routine traffic engineering duties were being handled; and to what extent traffic engineering tools such as accident record systems were being utilized. The results showed that some of the smaller cities and counties have problems. Many small local governments do not have a copy of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), or a trained staff or traffic engineering tools to practise most standards. Survey results are discussed regarding traffic control responsibility, the use of the MUTCD, traffic signing practices, pavement marking practices, school zone speed limits, traffic engineering tools, and the use of common nonstandard traffic control devices.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A survey (by 2-page questionnaire) is reported of cities and counties in Tennessee. The survey attempted to determine the following: who makes decisions on traffic control; how routine traffic engineering duties were being handled; and to what extent traffic engineering tools such as accident record systems were being utilized. The results showed that some of the smaller cities and counties have problems. Many small local governments do not have a copy of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), or a trained staff or traffic engineering tools to practise most standards. Survey results are discussed regarding traffic control responsibility, the use of the MUTCD, traffic signing practices, pavement marking practices, school zone speed limits, traffic engineering tools, and the use of common nonstandard traffic control devices.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A survey (by 2-page questionnaire) is reported of cities and counties in Tennessee. The survey attempted to determine the following: who makes decisions on traffic control; how routine traffic engineering duties were being handled; and to what extent traffic engineering tools such as accident record systems were being utilized. The results showed that some of the smaller cities and counties have problems. Many small local governments do not have a copy of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), or a trained staff or traffic engineering tools to practise most standards. Survey results are discussed regarding traffic control responsibility, the use of the MUTCD, traffic signing practices, pavement marking practices, school zone speed limits, traffic engineering tools, and the use of common nonstandard traffic control devices.

Key concepts: Traffic engineering, Control (management), Transport engineering, Traffic accident, Engineering, Traffic conflict, Computer science, Floating car data

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
LOCAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING: WHERE ARE WE? — Research Paper | ScholarLens