On the non-Tibetan nature of the East Bodish Languages of Bhutan
Gwendolyn Hyslop
Abstract
Open-access reader
Gwendolyn Hyslop
Abstract
Open-access reader
The�Himalayan�kingdom�of�Bhutan�is�home�to�many�different�ethnolinguistic�groups.�Some�of�these�groups�of�people�speak�Tibetic�languages,�such�as Dzongkha,�the�national�language�of�Bhutan.�Other�groups�speak�languages�that�are�as�different�from�Tibetan�as,�say,�Hindi�and�English�are�from�each�other.�A�group�that�falls�in�the�middle�of�the�Tibetic-non-Tibetic�cline�is�the�East�Bodish�language�sub-family.�East�Bodish�languages�show�some�remarkable�similarities�to�Tibetic�languages�on�the�surface,�but�closer�examination�reveals�much�of�this�similarity�may�be�due�to�borrowing�and�influence.�The�aim�of�this�article�is�to�examine�some�lexical�and�morphological�features�of�the�East�Bodish�languages�in�a�comparative�light.�In�doing�so,�we�illustrate�that�the�relationship�between�Tibetic�and�East�Bodish�languages�is�complex.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The�Himalayan�kingdom�of�Bhutan�is�home�to�many�different�ethnolinguistic�groups.�Some�of�these�groups�of�people�speak�Tibetic�languages,�such�as Dzongkha,�the�national�language�of�Bhutan.�Other�groups�speak�languages�that�are�as�different�from�Tibetan�as,�say,�Hindi�and�English�are�from�each�other.�A�group�that�falls�in�the�middle�of�the�Tibetic-non-Tibetic�cline�is�the�East�Bodish�language�sub-family.�East�Bodish�languages�show�some�remarkable�similarities�to�Tibetic�languages�on�the�surface,�but�closer�examination�reveals�much�of�this�similarity�may�be�due�to�borrowing�and�influence.�The�aim�of�this�article�is�to�examine�some�lexical�and�morphological�features�of�the�East�Bodish�languages�in�a�comparative�light.�In�doing�so,�we�illustrate�that�the�relationship�between�Tibetic�and�East�Bodish�languages�is�complex.
Key concepts: Geography, Linguistics, History, Philosophy