Recurrent lumbar disc herniation (contemporary diagnostics)
Д Б Миразимов
Abstract
Д Б Миразимов
Abstract
The diagnosis of the cause of recurrence back pain and sciatica after surgical remove of the lumbar disc herniation by clinic and neurologic examination is complicated. The discography can evaluate significance of the disc condition, but can’t demonstrate the change of spinal canal and its content. Magnetic resonance is an optimal method of diagnosis, but expensive for investigation. Computed tomography is considered as valuable method. There are some causes, which create difficulties on present showing of CT for distinguishing true recurrence of herniation from isolated epidural scar, for these purposes, we are elaborating differential characteristics.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The diagnosis of the cause of recurrence back pain and sciatica after surgical remove of the lumbar disc herniation by clinic and neurologic examination is complicated. The discography can evaluate significance of the disc condition, but can’t demonstrate the change of spinal canal and its content. Magnetic resonance is an optimal method of diagnosis, but expensive for investigation. Computed tomography is considered as valuable method. There are some causes, which create difficulties on present showing of CT for distinguishing true recurrence of herniation from isolated epidural scar, for these purposes, we are elaborating differential characteristics.
Key concepts: Sciatica, Medicine, Discography, Lumbar disc herniation, Disc herniation, Magnetic resonance imaging, Differential diagnosis, Low back pain