Calibrating Neutrality: The Evolving Global Opportunity Set
Sharon R. Hill, Chris Gowlland
Abstract
Sharon R. Hill, Chris Gowlland
Abstract
Modern portfolio theory suggests that investors can achieve maximum diversification holding a portfolio of risky assets reflecting the entire market, but no generally accepted method exists to construct such a portfolio.We present data on global equities and global fixed-income securities since 1990, and show that the relative weights of different asset classes have changed substantially, such that the market-neutral portfolio in these two major asset classes has not been constant over time. These results may be important for investors seeking to mimic the investable market, and could represent a benchmark for active allocation funds which principally hold equities and bonds.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Modern portfolio theory suggests that investors can achieve maximum diversification holding a portfolio of risky assets reflecting the entire market, but no generally accepted method exists to construct such a portfolio.We present data on global equities and global fixed-income securities since 1990, and show that the relative weights of different asset classes have changed substantially, such that the market-neutral portfolio in these two major asset classes has not been constant over time. These results may be important for investors seeking to mimic the investable market, and could represent a benchmark for active allocation funds which principally hold equities and bonds.
Key concepts: Portfolio, Diversification (marketing strategy), Asset allocation, Replicating portfolio, Financial economics, Market portfolio, Fixed income, Black–Litterman model