1985OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)Requires access

Future of arms control

Robert Johansen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The author, at the time of this article, noted that the Reagan administration's first-term policies severely limit the future prospects for arms control. He felt the bargaining-from-strength posture would aim for arms control agreements that give the appearance of a bold stroke for peace, but produce few if any constraints on the most destabilizing trends in military technology. While noting that the first 16 months of the administration produced no new proposals, he observes that the ones that were finally advanced were so one-sided as to be non-negotiable. He discusses the lost opportunities, erosion of existing arms constraints, the Reagan doctrine as a fatal blow to arms control and the demise of arms control, while suggesting a new approach. Finally, he proposes a more reactive role for Congress and the public to pressure the administration for more security-enhancing practices.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The author, at the time of this article, noted that the Reagan administration's first-term policies severely limit the future prospects for arms control. He felt the bargaining-from-strength posture would aim for arms control agreements that give the appearance of a bold stroke for peace, but produce few if any constraints on the most destabilizing trends in military technology. While noting that the first 16 months of the administration produced no new proposals, he observes that the ones that were finally advanced were so one-sided as to be non-negotiable. He discusses the lost opportunities, erosion of existing arms constraints, the Reagan doctrine as a fatal blow to arms control and the demise of arms control, while suggesting a new approach. Finally, he proposes a more reactive role for Congress and the public to pressure the administration for more security-enhancing practices.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The author, at the time of this article, noted that the Reagan administration's first-term policies severely limit the future prospects for arms control. He felt the bargaining-from-strength posture would aim for arms control agreements that give the appearance of a bold stroke for peace, but produce few if any constraints on the most destabilizing trends in military technology. While noting that the first 16 months of the administration produced no new proposals, he observes that the ones that were finally advanced were so one-sided as to be non-negotiable. He discusses the lost opportunities, erosion of existing arms constraints, the Reagan doctrine as a fatal blow to arms control and the demise of arms control, while suggesting a new approach. Finally, he proposes a more reactive role for Congress and the public to pressure the administration for more security-enhancing practices.

Key concepts: Demise, Arms control, Doctrine, Administration (probate law), Control (management), Political science, Cold war, Law and economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Future of arms control — Research Paper | ScholarLens