1995Cambridge Journal of EconomicsRequires access

The Kaleckian model of growth and distribution and its neo-Ricardian and neo-Marxian critiques

Marc Lavoie

Open publisher page 204 citations

Abstract

This paper analyses the newer Kaleckian models of growth and distribution and the criticisms that have been addressed to them by neo-Marxian and neo-Ricardian authors. The models discussed assume overhead labour costs and target return pricing. The main issues are the form of the investment function and the notions of normal rates of profit and of normal rates of capacity utilisation. Despite the relevance of (and often the similarity between) the neo-Marxian and neo-Ricardian critiques, it is shown that the main features of the Kaleckian growth model may still be preserved.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper analyses the newer Kaleckian models of growth and distribution and the criticisms that have been addressed to them by neo-Marxian and neo-Ricardian authors. The models discussed assume overhead labour costs and target return pricing. The main issues are the form of the investment function and the notions of normal rates of profit and of normal rates of capacity utilisation. Despite the relevance of (and often the similarity between) the neo-Marxian and neo-Ricardian critiques, it is shown that the main features of the Kaleckian growth model may still be preserved.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 204 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper analyses the newer Kaleckian models of growth and distribution and the criticisms that have been addressed to them by neo-Marxian and neo-Ricardian authors. The models discussed assume overhead labour costs and target return pricing. The main issues are the form of the investment function and the notions of normal rates of profit and of normal rates of capacity utilisation. Despite the relevance of (and often the similarity between) the neo-Marxian and neo-Ricardian critiques, it is shown that the main features of the Kaleckian growth model may still be preserved.

Key concepts: Economics, Investment function, Neoclassical economics, Growth model, Relevance (law), Profit (economics), Investment (military), Income distribution

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Kaleckian model of growth and distribution and its neo-Ricardian and neo-Marxian critiques — Research Paper | ScholarLens