2006•Indian Journal of Dryland Agricultural Research and DevelopmentRequires access

Improved technology for sustainable production of maize (Zea mays) in Shivalik foothills of Himachal Pradesh

Renu Yadav, Prem Singh, Rajesh K. Aggarwal, Munna Yadav

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Traditional method of maize cultivation has accelerated the process of water induced soil erosion and thereby reduced the production potential of the land. Improved crop production technology has the potential to sustain maize yield by improving soil productivity. Different sets of treatments were tested at 15 locations in farmers’ fields for three consecutive kharif seasons (2001–2003) at village Johranpur in district Solan of Himachal Pradesh. The treatments were farmer's practice (T1), recommended package of practices (T2), integrated nutrient management with 25 per cent N replacement by FYM (T3) and improved practice with addition of ZnS04 in T3 treatment (T4). Treatment T4 proved to be the best in terms of crop yield, nutrient uptake, gross return, net return and benefit-cost ratio. The grain and stover yield of maize increased by 1.36 to 1.68 and 1.52 to 1.71 times, respectively under different treatments over farmer's practice. The net return increased by Rs. 6,612/-, 9,491/- and 10,033/- in T2, T3 and T4 respectively over T1 (farmer's practice). Treatment T4was found to be the most economic with BC ratio of 2.71 in comparison to 1.65, 2.27 and 2.70 in case of T1 T2 and T3 treatments, respectively.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Traditional method of maize cultivation has accelerated the process of water induced soil erosion and thereby reduced the production potential of the land. Improved crop production technology has the potential to sustain maize yield by improving soil productivity. Different sets of treatments were tested at 15 locations in farmers’ fields for three consecutive kharif seasons (2001–2003) at village Johranpur in district Solan of Himachal Pradesh. The treatments were farmer's practice (T1), recommended package of practices (T2), integrated nutrient management with 25 per cent N replacement by FYM (T3) and improved practice with addition of ZnS04 in T3 treatment (T4). Treatment T4 proved to be the best in terms of crop yield, nutrient uptake, gross return, net return and benefit-cost ratio. The grain and stover yield of maize increased by 1.36 to 1.68 and 1.52 to 1.71 times, respectively under different treatments over farmer's practice. The net return increased by Rs. 6,612/-, 9,491/- and 10,033/- in T2, T3 and T4 respectively over T1 (farmer's practice). Treatment T4was found to be the most economic with BC ratio of 2.71 in comparison to 1.65, 2.27 and 2.70 in case of T1 T2 and T3 treatments, respectively.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Traditional method of maize cultivation has accelerated the process of water induced soil erosion and thereby reduced the production potential of the land. Improved crop production technology has the potential to sustain maize yield by improving soil productivity. Different sets of treatments were tested at 15 locations in farmers’ fields for three consecutive kharif seasons (2001–2003) at village Johranpur in district Solan of Himachal Pradesh. The treatments were farmer's practice (T1), recommended package of practices (T2), integrated nutrient management with 25 per cent N replacement by FYM (T3) and improved practice with addition of ZnS04 in T3 treatment (T4). Treatment T4 proved to be the best in terms of crop yield, nutrient uptake, gross return, net return and benefit-cost ratio. The grain and stover yield of maize increased by 1.36 to 1.68 and 1.52 to 1.71 times, respectively under different treatments over farmer's practice. The net return increased by Rs. 6,612/-, 9,491/- and 10,033/- in T2, T3 and T4 respectively over T1 (farmer's practice). Treatment T4was found to be the most economic with BC ratio of 2.71 in comparison to 1.65, 2.27 and 2.70 in case of T1 T2 and T3 treatments, respectively.

Key concepts: Kharif crop, Forensic science, Stover, Non-invasive ventilation, Insomnia, Zea mays, Mathematics, Yield (engineering)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Improved technology for sustainable production of maize (Zea mays) in Shivalik foothills of Himachal Pradesh — Research Paper | ScholarLens