2004Warasan Witthayasat Mahawitthayalai NaresuanRequires access

DEVELOPMENT OF FLOW INJECTION ANALYSIS SYSTEM FOR DETERMINATION OF IRON(II) AND TOTAL IRON IN GROUND WATER

Jintana Klamtet

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

A reversed flow injection spectrophotometric determination of iron(II) and total iron has been carried out. It is based on the reaction between iron(II) and 4-(2-pyridylazo)-resorcinol (PAR) in acetate buffer pH 9.0 yielding a yellowish-orange coloured complex with an absorption maximum at 714 nm. The 50 μl of 5×10-4 mol L-1 PAR solution was injected into a continuous flowing stream of 0.01 M HCl with an appropriate flow rate of 0.9 ml min- 1. Then, it was merged with sample solution and acetate buffer flowing at the rate of 2.2 and 2.4 ml min-1, respectively, and the sample zone was detected by spectrophotometer. The optimum conditions of this system were determined. Two linear calibration curves over the concentration range 0.05-3.00 mg L-1 of iron(II) and iron(III) solutions were obtained with the regression equations A=0.176C+0.0128 (r2=0.9988) and A=0.1116C + 0.0018 (r2=0.9966), respectively. A detection limit (defined as 2σ) was 0.012 mg L-1 with a sample throughput of 180 samples h-1. The relative standard deviation was 0..21% (n = 15) at the 3.00 mg L-1 Fe (II). The proposed method was successfully applied to the determination of iron (II) and total iron in groundwater. Analytical results obtained by the proposed method were in good agreement with those obtained by reference methods. Keywords : Flow injection analysis, PAR,Iron

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A reversed flow injection spectrophotometric determination of iron(II) and total iron has been carried out. It is based on the reaction between iron(II) and 4-(2-pyridylazo)-resorcinol (PAR) in acetate buffer pH 9.0 yielding a yellowish-orange coloured complex with an absorption maximum at 714 nm. The 50 μl of 5×10-4 mol L-1 PAR solution was injected into a continuous flowing stream of 0.01 M HCl with an appropriate flow rate of 0.9 ml min- 1. Then, it was merged with sample solution and acetate buffer flowing at the rate of 2.2 and 2.4 ml min-1, respectively, and the sample zone was detected by spectrophotometer. The optimum conditions of this system were determined. Two linear calibration curves over the concentration range 0.05-3.00 mg L-1 of iron(II) and iron(III) solutions were obtained with the regression equations A=0.176C+0.0128 (r2=0.9988) and A=0.1116C + 0.0018 (r2=0.9966), respectively. A detection limit (defined as 2σ) was 0.012 mg L-1 with a sample throughput of 180 samples h-1. The relative standard deviation was 0..21% (n = 15) at the 3.00 mg L-1 Fe (II). The proposed method was successfully applied to the determination of iron (II) and total iron in groundwater. Analytical results obtained by the proposed method were in good agreement with those obtained by reference methods. Keywords : Flow injection analysis, PAR,Iron

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A reversed flow injection spectrophotometric determination of iron(II) and total iron has been carried out. It is based on the reaction between iron(II) and 4-(2-pyridylazo)-resorcinol (PAR) in acetate buffer pH 9.0 yielding a yellowish-orange coloured complex with an absorption maximum at 714 nm. The 50 μl of 5×10-4 mol L-1 PAR solution was injected into a continuous flowing stream of 0.01 M HCl with an appropriate flow rate of 0.9 ml min- 1. Then, it was merged with sample solution and acetate buffer flowing at the rate of 2.2 and 2.4 ml min-1, respectively, and the sample zone was detected by spectrophotometer. The optimum conditions of this system were determined. Two linear calibration curves over the concentration range 0.05-3.00 mg L-1 of iron(II) and iron(III) solutions were obtained with the regression equations A=0.176C+0.0128 (r2=0.9988) and A=0.1116C + 0.0018 (r2=0.9966), respectively. A detection limit (defined as 2σ) was 0.012 mg L-1 with a sample throughput of 180 samples h-1. The relative standard deviation was 0..21% (n = 15) at the 3.00 mg L-1 Fe (II). The proposed method was successfully applied to the determination of iron (II) and total iron in groundwater. Analytical results obtained by the proposed method were in good agreement with those obtained by reference methods. Keywords : Flow injection analysis, PAR,Iron

Key concepts: Chemistry, Resorcinol, Analytical Chemistry (journal), Detection limit, Flow injection analysis, Volumetric flow rate, Calibration curve, Buffer solution

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
DEVELOPMENT OF FLOW INJECTION ANALYSIS SYSTEM FOR DETERMINATION OF IRON(II) AND TOTAL IRON IN GROUND WATER — Research Paper | ScholarLens