1992•SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper seriesRequires access

Comparison of Traditional and Finite Element Solutions to Random Vibration Problems

S. K. Tsang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Despite recent improvements in finite element applications, random vibration problems encountered in practical design situations continue to be tackled by a traditional simplified approach based on a single mode and single degree of freedom response. This paper presents an outline of this approach and examines its accuracy and validity by correlating its results against a finite element program for two specific examples. The correlation indicates that stress predictions using the traditional approach based on equivalent static loads are acceptable for design purposes, but displacement velocity and acceleration response estimates can be dangerously optimistic. The effects of damping and modal interactions on structural response are studied and the difficulties associated with accurate damping selection are also discussed from a practical standpoint.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Despite recent improvements in finite element applications, random vibration problems encountered in practical design situations continue to be tackled by a traditional simplified approach based on a single mode and single degree of freedom response. This paper presents an outline of this approach and examines its accuracy and validity by correlating its results against a finite element program for two specific examples. The correlation indicates that stress predictions using the traditional approach based on equivalent static loads are acceptable for design purposes, but displacement velocity and acceleration response estimates can be dangerously optimistic. The effects of damping and modal interactions on structural response are studied and the difficulties associated with accurate damping selection are also discussed from a practical standpoint.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Despite recent improvements in finite element applications, random vibration problems encountered in practical design situations continue to be tackled by a traditional simplified approach based on a single mode and single degree of freedom response. This paper presents an outline of this approach and examines its accuracy and validity by correlating its results against a finite element program for two specific examples. The correlation indicates that stress predictions using the traditional approach based on equivalent static loads are acceptable for design purposes, but displacement velocity and acceleration response estimates can be dangerously optimistic. The effects of damping and modal interactions on structural response are studied and the difficulties associated with accurate damping selection are also discussed from a practical standpoint.

Key concepts: Finite element method, Vibration, Computer science, Mixed finite element method, Smoothed finite element method, Structural engineering, Physics, Acoustics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of Traditional and Finite Element Solutions to Random Vibration Problems — Research Paper | ScholarLens