1994Journal of Obstetrics and GynaecologyRequires access

A study comparing the ovarian effects of levonorgestrel and desogestrel given orally and by vaginal ring

Robert S. Jackson, X. F. Li, Richard Newton

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

SummarySummaryTo compare the effects of two progestagens delivered in two different ways, 40 healthy ovulating volunteers were allocated to four groups. Study design included a control cycle, a study cycle and a recovery cycle. On day two of the menstrual cycle, group 1 used a vaginal ring releasing 20 μg/24 hours of levonorgestrel for 21 days, group 2 and 3 took 30 μg levonorgestrel and 60 μg desogestrel tablets respectively for 21 days. Group 4 used a 3-keto-desogestrel vaginal ring releasing 30 μg/24 hours. The steady state plasma levels with the keto-desogestrel ring did not differ from the trough levels of the 60 μg desogestrel tablets. The release rate from the levonorgestrel containing ring was in a similar relationship to the release rate from the levonorgestrel tablet. Ovulation was inhibited in 4/10 in the levonorgestrel ring group, 8/10 with the levonorgestrel tablet group; no ovulation was seen with the keto-desogestrel tablet or the desogestrel ring. All treatments were associated with persistent follicle formation, but no difference between the groups was found in this respect. A new classification of ovarian reaction including ultrasound data, reflecting the above findings, is proposed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

SummarySummaryTo compare the effects of two progestagens delivered in two different ways, 40 healthy ovulating volunteers were allocated to four groups. Study design included a control cycle, a study cycle and a recovery cycle. On day two of the menstrual cycle, group 1 used a vaginal ring releasing 20 μg/24 hours of levonorgestrel for 21 days, group 2 and 3 took 30 μg levonorgestrel and 60 μg desogestrel tablets respectively for 21 days. Group 4 used a 3-keto-desogestrel vaginal ring releasing 30 μg/24 hours. The steady state plasma levels with the keto-desogestrel ring did not differ from the trough levels of the 60 μg desogestrel tablets. The release rate from the levonorgestrel containing ring was in a similar relationship to the release rate from the levonorgestrel tablet. Ovulation was inhibited in 4/10 in the levonorgestrel ring group, 8/10 with the levonorgestrel tablet group; no ovulation was seen with the keto-desogestrel tablet or the desogestrel ring. All treatments were associated with persistent follicle formation, but no difference between the groups was found in this respect. A new classification of ovarian reaction including ultrasound data, reflecting the above findings, is proposed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

SummarySummaryTo compare the effects of two progestagens delivered in two different ways, 40 healthy ovulating volunteers were allocated to four groups. Study design included a control cycle, a study cycle and a recovery cycle. On day two of the menstrual cycle, group 1 used a vaginal ring releasing 20 μg/24 hours of levonorgestrel for 21 days, group 2 and 3 took 30 μg levonorgestrel and 60 μg desogestrel tablets respectively for 21 days. Group 4 used a 3-keto-desogestrel vaginal ring releasing 30 μg/24 hours. The steady state plasma levels with the keto-desogestrel ring did not differ from the trough levels of the 60 μg desogestrel tablets. The release rate from the levonorgestrel containing ring was in a similar relationship to the release rate from the levonorgestrel tablet. Ovulation was inhibited in 4/10 in the levonorgestrel ring group, 8/10 with the levonorgestrel tablet group; no ovulation was seen with the keto-desogestrel tablet or the desogestrel ring. All treatments were associated with persistent follicle formation, but no difference between the groups was found in this respect. A new classification of ovarian reaction including ultrasound data, reflecting the above findings, is proposed.

Key concepts: Desogestrel, Levonorgestrel, Vaginal ring, Ovulation, Medicine, Ethinylestradiol, Menstrual cycle, Endocrinology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A study comparing the ovarian effects of levonorgestrel and desogestrel given orally and by vaginal ring — Research Paper | ScholarLens