1987European Heart JournalRequires access

Intravenous digital subtraction angiography in the diagnosis and management of acute aortic dissection

J P Lyons, AH Gershlick, M S Norell, M. Rubens, Patrick Magee, C Layton

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Eleven patients presenting with the clinical diagnosis of suspected aortic dissection underwent intravenous digital subtraction aortography. In nine patients digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was performed as the investigation of first choice. In five of these the diagnosis was confirmed with this technique alone and surgical repair was undertaken without further investigation. Direct cine aortography was also undertaken in the other four patients and confirmed the DSA findings, demonstrating aortic dissection in one case and no dissection in three others. In two of the eleven patients, direct cine aortography was performed as the initial investigation. The results of subsequent digital aortography concurred in both cases, aortic dissection being demonstrated in one patient. In two cases, despite normal cine and digital aortography, aortic dissection was confirmed by computed tomography. We have found DSA to be a valuable technique for diagnosing aortic dissection, with no false positive or false negative findings when compared to direct cine aortography. Since it is a less traumatic procedure than direct aortography it should be the investigation of choice if computed tomography is not immediately available.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Eleven patients presenting with the clinical diagnosis of suspected aortic dissection underwent intravenous digital subtraction aortography. In nine patients digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was performed as the investigation of first choice. In five of these the diagnosis was confirmed with this technique alone and surgical repair was undertaken without further investigation. Direct cine aortography was also undertaken in the other four patients and confirmed the DSA findings, demonstrating aortic dissection in one case and no dissection in three others. In two of the eleven patients, direct cine aortography was performed as the initial investigation. The results of subsequent digital aortography concurred in both cases, aortic dissection being demonstrated in one patient. In two cases, despite normal cine and digital aortography, aortic dissection was confirmed by computed tomography. We have found DSA to be a valuable technique for diagnosing aortic dissection, with no false positive or false negative findings when compared to direct cine aortography. Since it is a less traumatic procedure than direct aortography it should be the investigation of choice if computed tomography is not immediately available.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Eleven patients presenting with the clinical diagnosis of suspected aortic dissection underwent intravenous digital subtraction aortography. In nine patients digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was performed as the investigation of first choice. In five of these the diagnosis was confirmed with this technique alone and surgical repair was undertaken without further investigation. Direct cine aortography was also undertaken in the other four patients and confirmed the DSA findings, demonstrating aortic dissection in one case and no dissection in three others. In two of the eleven patients, direct cine aortography was performed as the initial investigation. The results of subsequent digital aortography concurred in both cases, aortic dissection being demonstrated in one patient. In two cases, despite normal cine and digital aortography, aortic dissection was confirmed by computed tomography. We have found DSA to be a valuable technique for diagnosing aortic dissection, with no false positive or false negative findings when compared to direct cine aortography. Since it is a less traumatic procedure than direct aortography it should be the investigation of choice if computed tomography is not immediately available.

Key concepts: Aortography, Medicine, Aortic dissection, Digital subtraction angiography, Radiology, Dissection (medical), Angiography, Subtraction

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Intravenous digital subtraction angiography in the diagnosis and management of acute aortic dissection — Research Paper | ScholarLens