2013•PubMedRequires access

Making sense of the change in how Medicare Advantage plans are paid.

Marsha Gold

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

The Affordable Care Act has altered payment policy for private Medicare Advantage (MA) plans, with the goal of lowering costs closer to the level in traditional Medicare. Using newly available information on 2009 MA plan costs, this analysis com­pares plans' estimates of per capita costs for providing Parts A and B benefits to their enrollees, on a risk-adjusted basis, against what government data show to be the same costs for traditional Medicare program beneficiaries residing in the same county. It finds that on average, risk-adjusted MA plan costs were 4 percent higher than traditional Medicare costs (104%). Among plan types, only HMOs had lower average costs than traditional Medicare. Among local PPOs and private fee-for service plans, over 75 percent had costs exceeding those in traditional Medicare. The wide variation seen in MA plan costs relative to traditional Medicare suggests there is room for greater efficiency in care delivery.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The Affordable Care Act has altered payment policy for private Medicare Advantage (MA) plans, with the goal of lowering costs closer to the level in traditional Medicare. Using newly available information on 2009 MA plan costs, this analysis com­pares plans' estimates of per capita costs for providing Parts A and B benefits to their enrollees, on a risk-adjusted basis, against what government data show to be the same costs for traditional Medicare program beneficiaries residing in the same county. It finds that on average, risk-adjusted MA plan costs were 4 percent higher than traditional Medicare costs (104%). Among plan types, only HMOs had lower average costs than traditional Medicare. Among local PPOs and private fee-for service plans, over 75 percent had costs exceeding those in traditional Medicare. The wide variation seen in MA plan costs relative to traditional Medicare suggests there is room for greater efficiency in care delivery.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The Affordable Care Act has altered payment policy for private Medicare Advantage (MA) plans, with the goal of lowering costs closer to the level in traditional Medicare. Using newly available information on 2009 MA plan costs, this analysis com­pares plans' estimates of per capita costs for providing Parts A and B benefits to their enrollees, on a risk-adjusted basis, against what government data show to be the same costs for traditional Medicare program beneficiaries residing in the same county. It finds that on average, risk-adjusted MA plan costs were 4 percent higher than traditional Medicare costs (104%). Among plan types, only HMOs had lower average costs than traditional Medicare. Among local PPOs and private fee-for service plans, over 75 percent had costs exceeding those in traditional Medicare. The wide variation seen in MA plan costs relative to traditional Medicare suggests there is room for greater efficiency in care delivery.

Key concepts: Medicare Advantage, Business, Payment, Plan (archaeology), Government (linguistics), Actuarial science, Per capita, Service (business)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Making sense of the change in how Medicare Advantage plans are paid. — Research Paper | ScholarLens