1995Unpublished venueRequires access

Modelling Daily and Monthly Runoff in Urban Catchments

Francis H. S. Chiew, EH Osman, TA McMahon

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

The ability of five modelling approaches to estimate daily and monthly runoff for three urban catchments in Canberra is assessed. The simulations indicate that a two-parameter impervious area model (runoff coefficient and rainfall/runoff threshold) combined with a four-parameter partial area runoff with baseflow model for the pervious area is sufficient to provide satisfactory estimates of monthly runoff in the urban catchments. However, using the moderately complex conceptual eight-parameter modified-HYDROLOG Model to simulate the pervious area gives better estimates of daily runoff in the urban catchments compared to the other approaches. Simpler methods like the Polynomial Equation and the SFB Model cannot simulate runoff satisfactorily. AQUALM, a model which has been frequently used for studies in urban catchments in south-east Australia, perform reasonably well compared to HYDROLOG and the partial area runoff model.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The ability of five modelling approaches to estimate daily and monthly runoff for three urban catchments in Canberra is assessed. The simulations indicate that a two-parameter impervious area model (runoff coefficient and rainfall/runoff threshold) combined with a four-parameter partial area runoff with baseflow model for the pervious area is sufficient to provide satisfactory estimates of monthly runoff in the urban catchments. However, using the moderately complex conceptual eight-parameter modified-HYDROLOG Model to simulate the pervious area gives better estimates of daily runoff in the urban catchments compared to the other approaches. Simpler methods like the Polynomial Equation and the SFB Model cannot simulate runoff satisfactorily. AQUALM, a model which has been frequently used for studies in urban catchments in south-east Australia, perform reasonably well compared to HYDROLOG and the partial area runoff model.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The ability of five modelling approaches to estimate daily and monthly runoff for three urban catchments in Canberra is assessed. The simulations indicate that a two-parameter impervious area model (runoff coefficient and rainfall/runoff threshold) combined with a four-parameter partial area runoff with baseflow model for the pervious area is sufficient to provide satisfactory estimates of monthly runoff in the urban catchments. However, using the moderately complex conceptual eight-parameter modified-HYDROLOG Model to simulate the pervious area gives better estimates of daily runoff in the urban catchments compared to the other approaches. Simpler methods like the Polynomial Equation and the SFB Model cannot simulate runoff satisfactorily. AQUALM, a model which has been frequently used for studies in urban catchments in south-east Australia, perform reasonably well compared to HYDROLOG and the partial area runoff model.

Key concepts: Surface runoff, Impervious surface, Baseflow, Runoff curve number, Environmental science, Hydrology (agriculture), Runoff model, Urban runoff

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Modelling Daily and Monthly Runoff in Urban Catchments — Research Paper | ScholarLens