2003PubMedRequires access

A possible influence of gingival dimensions on attachment loss and gingival recession following placement of artificial crowns.

Ulrich Koke, Christoph Sander, Achim Heinecke, Hans‐Peter Müller

Open publisher page 42 citations

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to determine the influence of gingival dimensions on the development of gingival recession following placement of artificial crowns. The study population consisted of 11 periodontally healthy patients in whom 44 maxillary anterior teeth and/or premolars had to be crowned. A total of 36 teeth (82%) had, after crown placement, a mean intracrevicular crown margin of 0.57 +/- 0.47 mm. Thirty-nine teeth without restorations served as controls. Immediately after incorporation, as well as after 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, periodontal examinations were carried out. Gingival thickness was determined sonometrically and averaged 1.25 +/- 0.40 mm. Mean periodontal probing depth was 1.80 +/- 0.54 mm. Twelve months later, crowned teeth had experienced a mean attachment loss of 0.17 +/- 0.99 mm as compared to an attachment gain of 0.18 +/- 0.46 mm at control teeth. At test teeth, the gingival margin had receded a mean of 0.43 +/- 0.74 mm. In multivariate analyses considering the correlated structure of the data employing generalized estimating equation methods, crown placement was identified as a major factor for attachment loss and development of gingival recession. In addition, a shallow probing depth and narrow band of gingiva negatively influenced the level of periodontal attachment. The present results point to the importance of a more detailed periodontal diagnosis of the dentogingival region before placement of artificial crowns.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The aim of the present study was to determine the influence of gingival dimensions on the development of gingival recession following placement of artificial crowns. The study population consisted of 11 periodontally healthy patients in whom 44 maxillary anterior teeth and/or premolars had to be crowned. A total of 36 teeth (82%) had, after crown placement, a mean intracrevicular crown margin of 0.57 +/- 0.47 mm. Thirty-nine teeth without restorations served as controls. Immediately after incorporation, as well as after 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, periodontal examinations were carried out. Gingival thickness was determined sonometrically and averaged 1.25 +/- 0.40 mm. Mean periodontal probing depth was 1.80 +/- 0.54 mm. Twelve months later, crowned teeth had experienced a mean attachment loss of 0.17 +/- 0.99 mm as compared to an attachment gain of 0.18 +/- 0.46 mm at control teeth. At test teeth, the gingival margin had receded a mean of 0.43 +/- 0.74 mm. In multivariate analyses considering the correlated structure of the data employing generalized estimating equation methods, crown placement was identified as a major factor for attachment loss and development of gingival recession. In addition, a shallow probing depth and narrow band of gingiva negatively influenced the level of periodontal attachment. The present results point to the importance of a more detailed periodontal diagnosis of the dentogingival region before placement of artificial crowns.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 42 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The aim of the present study was to determine the influence of gingival dimensions on the development of gingival recession following placement of artificial crowns. The study population consisted of 11 periodontally healthy patients in whom 44 maxillary anterior teeth and/or premolars had to be crowned. A total of 36 teeth (82%) had, after crown placement, a mean intracrevicular crown margin of 0.57 +/- 0.47 mm. Thirty-nine teeth without restorations served as controls. Immediately after incorporation, as well as after 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, periodontal examinations were carried out. Gingival thickness was determined sonometrically and averaged 1.25 +/- 0.40 mm. Mean periodontal probing depth was 1.80 +/- 0.54 mm. Twelve months later, crowned teeth had experienced a mean attachment loss of 0.17 +/- 0.99 mm as compared to an attachment gain of 0.18 +/- 0.46 mm at control teeth. At test teeth, the gingival margin had receded a mean of 0.43 +/- 0.74 mm. In multivariate analyses considering the correlated structure of the data employing generalized estimating equation methods, crown placement was identified as a major factor for attachment loss and development of gingival recession. In addition, a shallow probing depth and narrow band of gingiva negatively influenced the level of periodontal attachment. The present results point to the importance of a more detailed periodontal diagnosis of the dentogingival region before placement of artificial crowns.

Key concepts: Gingival margin, Gingival recession, Dentistry, Crown (dentistry), Medicine, Orthodontics, Gingival and periodontal pocket, Periodontal probe

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A possible influence of gingival dimensions on attachment loss and gingival recession following placement of artificial crowns. — Research Paper | ScholarLens