ScholarLens Back to search
2016•HADITHRequires access

COMMON FEATURES OF MUSLIM AND WESTERN ḤADĪTH CRITICISM: IBN AL-JAWZĪ'S CATEGORIES OF ḤADĪTH FORGERS

Albrecht Noth

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

The different assessments can be characterised briefly as follows: Muslim scholars consider forgery to be the exception, Orientalists consider it to be the rule.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The different assessments can be characterised briefly as follows: Muslim scholars consider forgery to be the exception, Orientalists consider it to be the rule.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The different assessments can be characterised briefly as follows: Muslim scholars consider forgery to be the exception, Orientalists consider it to be the rule.

Key concepts: Criticism, Art, Philosophy, Literature, Ancient history, History

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
COMMON FEATURES OF MUSLIM AND WESTERN ḤADĪTH CRITICISM: IBN AL-JAWZĪ'S CATEGORIES OF ḤADĪTH FORGERS — Research Paper | ScholarLens