1965Journal of Professional PracticeRequires access

A Critique of Engineering Education

Dabney S. Craddock

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Today's professional engineer is charged with the awesome task of digesting vast quantities of new technical material to solve the engineering problems of an advancing society. One of the responsibilities of engineering education is to spread this new material throughout The profession via the engineering graduates. This progressive and increasingly complex nature of engineering knowledge is antiquating the present 4-yr program. This concept, combined with the fact that the engineer must have a thorough liberal education in the humanities and the social sciences, makes present (1965) engineering education increasingly inadequate. However, the common problems of higher education must also be solved. The various professional engineering societies should demand updating revisions in engineering education and should closely monitor these changes to assure a uniform educational program.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Today's professional engineer is charged with the awesome task of digesting vast quantities of new technical material to solve the engineering problems of an advancing society. One of the responsibilities of engineering education is to spread this new material throughout The profession via the engineering graduates. This progressive and increasingly complex nature of engineering knowledge is antiquating the present 4-yr program. This concept, combined with the fact that the engineer must have a thorough liberal education in the humanities and the social sciences, makes present (1965) engineering education increasingly inadequate. However, the common problems of higher education must also be solved. The various professional engineering societies should demand updating revisions in engineering education and should closely monitor these changes to assure a uniform educational program.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Today's professional engineer is charged with the awesome task of digesting vast quantities of new technical material to solve the engineering problems of an advancing society. One of the responsibilities of engineering education is to spread this new material throughout The profession via the engineering graduates. This progressive and increasingly complex nature of engineering knowledge is antiquating the present 4-yr program. This concept, combined with the fact that the engineer must have a thorough liberal education in the humanities and the social sciences, makes present (1965) engineering education increasingly inadequate. However, the common problems of higher education must also be solved. The various professional engineering societies should demand updating revisions in engineering education and should closely monitor these changes to assure a uniform educational program.

Key concepts: Engineering education, Engineering ethics, Task (project management), Health systems engineering, Biological systems engineering, Engineering, Engineering management, Civil engineering software

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Critique of Engineering Education — Research Paper | ScholarLens