2012•The FASEB JournalRequires access

Comparative analysis of masticatory apparatus features in neonatal common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) and cotton‐top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus)

Amy Lovejoy Mork, Andrea B. Taylor, Christopher J. Vinyard

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Marmosets are unique among callitrichids in habitually gouging trees with their anterior teeth to stimulate exudate flow. Previous analyses suggest that the masticatory apparatus of adult marmosets displays features facilitating relatively large jaw gapes, but decreased load‐resistance ability relative to closely‐related non‐gouging tamarins. We analyzed masticatory apparatus features of neonatal marmosets and tamarins to determine if the morphological differences observed between adults are present at birth. If marmoset infants show similar morphological divergence as adults, then the early appearance of these features suggest they are potential adaptations for tree gouging at wide gapes. We examined six stillborn common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) and six cotton‐top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). We microCT scanned the jaws, quantified fiber architecture of masticatory muscles and estimated symphyseal strength in simulated in vitro loading. We found few differences in mandibular cross‐sectional geometry, symphyseal strength or jaw‐muscle architecture between marmoset and tamarin neonates. Collectively, these findings suggest that at least some of the postnatal changes in the marmoset mandible and jaw‐muscle architecture that facilitate wide gapes, but reduced load‐resisting abilities compared to tamarins, arise from phenotypic plasticity related to gouging at wide gapes. Grant Funding Source : This work was funded by grants from the National Science Foundation (BCS‐0959438; BCS‐0412153).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Marmosets are unique among callitrichids in habitually gouging trees with their anterior teeth to stimulate exudate flow. Previous analyses suggest that the masticatory apparatus of adult marmosets displays features facilitating relatively large jaw gapes, but decreased load‐resistance ability relative to closely‐related non‐gouging tamarins. We analyzed masticatory apparatus features of neonatal marmosets and tamarins to determine if the morphological differences observed between adults are present at birth. If marmoset infants show similar morphological divergence as adults, then the early appearance of these features suggest they are potential adaptations for tree gouging at wide gapes. We examined six stillborn common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) and six cotton‐top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). We microCT scanned the jaws, quantified fiber architecture of masticatory muscles and estimated symphyseal strength in simulated in vitro loading. We found few differences in mandibular cross‐sectional geometry, symphyseal strength or jaw‐muscle architecture between marmoset and tamarin neonates. Collectively, these findings suggest that at least some of the postnatal changes in the marmoset mandible and jaw‐muscle architecture that facilitate wide gapes, but reduced load‐resisting abilities compared to tamarins, arise from phenotypic plasticity related to gouging at wide gapes. Grant Funding Source : This work was funded by grants from the National Science Foundation (BCS‐0959438; BCS‐0412153).

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Marmosets are unique among callitrichids in habitually gouging trees with their anterior teeth to stimulate exudate flow. Previous analyses suggest that the masticatory apparatus of adult marmosets displays features facilitating relatively large jaw gapes, but decreased load‐resistance ability relative to closely‐related non‐gouging tamarins. We analyzed masticatory apparatus features of neonatal marmosets and tamarins to determine if the morphological differences observed between adults are present at birth. If marmoset infants show similar morphological divergence as adults, then the early appearance of these features suggest they are potential adaptations for tree gouging at wide gapes. We examined six stillborn common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) and six cotton‐top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). We microCT scanned the jaws, quantified fiber architecture of masticatory muscles and estimated symphyseal strength in simulated in vitro loading. We found few differences in mandibular cross‐sectional geometry, symphyseal strength or jaw‐muscle architecture between marmoset and tamarin neonates. Collectively, these findings suggest that at least some of the postnatal changes in the marmoset mandible and jaw‐muscle architecture that facilitate wide gapes, but reduced load‐resisting abilities compared to tamarins, arise from phenotypic plasticity related to gouging at wide gapes. Grant Funding Source : This work was funded by grants from the National Science Foundation (BCS‐0959438; BCS‐0412153).

Key concepts: Marmoset, Callitrichidae, Callithrix, Masticatory force, Biology, Anatomy, Primate, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative analysis of masticatory apparatus features in neonatal common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) and cotton‐top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) — Research Paper | ScholarLens