Microfoundations, Minsky and Classical Political Economy
Jan Toporowski
Abstract
Jan Toporowski
Abstract
The microfoundations discourse originated as a critique of modelling abstracted from theory, in the sense of an explanation of the economic decisions that are supposed to give rise to particular economic outcomes. However, reduction of theory to individual choices and optimisation, integrated by prices and markets, overlooks the key role played by the circular flow of income in integrating individual choices, noted by Schumpeter and Marx, and the key distinction between households and firms that underlies Keynesian macroeconomics and the theories of Minsky, because the expenditure decisions of firms determine aggregate incomes.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The microfoundations discourse originated as a critique of modelling abstracted from theory, in the sense of an explanation of the economic decisions that are supposed to give rise to particular economic outcomes. However, reduction of theory to individual choices and optimisation, integrated by prices and markets, overlooks the key role played by the circular flow of income in integrating individual choices, noted by Schumpeter and Marx, and the key distinction between households and firms that underlies Keynesian macroeconomics and the theories of Minsky, because the expenditure decisions of firms determine aggregate incomes.
Key concepts: Microfoundations, Economics, Post-Keynesian economics, Keynesian economics, Neoclassical economics, Macroeconomics, Politics, Political science