2011bepress Legal RepositoryOpen access

The Relevance of the Judicial Activism vs. Judicial Restraint Discourse

Ariel L. Bendor

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

The Origin and Current Meanings of "Judicial Activism," 92 CALIF.L. REv.1441, 1442-43 (2004) (seeking to clarify the meaning of judicial activism, especially "when it is used in different contexts, so that those who use the term can communicate their ideas more effectively.").2. Id.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The Origin and Current Meanings of "Judicial Activism," 92 CALIF.L. REv.1441, 1442-43 (2004) (seeking to clarify the meaning of judicial activism, especially "when it is used in different contexts, so that those who use the term can communicate their ideas more effectively.").2. Id.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The Origin and Current Meanings of "Judicial Activism," 92 CALIF.L. REv.1441, 1442-43 (2004) (seeking to clarify the meaning of judicial activism, especially "when it is used in different contexts, so that those who use the term can communicate their ideas more effectively.").2. Id.

Key concepts: Relevance (law), Judicial activism, Political science, Judicial restraint, Law, Judicial opinion, Psychology, Judicial review

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Relevance of the Judicial Activism vs. Judicial Restraint Discourse — Research Paper | ScholarLens