1974University of Pennsylvania Law ReviewRequires access

Choice of Law and the Proposed Federal Rules of Evidence: New Perspectives

Louise Weinberg

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

On November 20, 1972, the Supreme Court promulgated a new federal evidentiary code,' to become effective July 1, 1973, unless Congress took supervening action. 2 It was then for Congress to determine, if only by inaction, whether the proposed Federal Rules of Evidence would control trials of cases in federal courts.It was widely anticipated that Congress would, as a matter of course, allow the proposed rules to take effcct. 3 However, despite the submission to the profession of substantially similar preliminary drafts in 19691 and in 1971, 5 the proposed rules have recently become the focus of criticism.The controversy centers for the most part upon two issues: first, whether procedural evidentiary rules have been used to effect substantive changes in the law; and second, whether the new rules override conflicting state rules thought to be substantive in nature in cases in which state law supplies the rule of decision. 6 In response to this controversy Congress has passed a bill postponing the rules'

About this research paper

What this paper is about

On November 20, 1972, the Supreme Court promulgated a new federal evidentiary code,' to become effective July 1, 1973, unless Congress took supervening action. 2 It was then for Congress to determine, if only by inaction, whether the proposed Federal Rules of Evidence would control trials of cases in federal courts.It was widely anticipated that Congress would, as a matter of course, allow the proposed rules to take effcct. 3 However, despite the submission to the profession of substantially similar preliminary drafts in 19691 and in 1971, 5 the proposed rules have recently become the focus of criticism.The controversy centers for the most part upon two issues: first, whether procedural evidentiary rules have been used to effect substantive changes in the law; and second, whether the new rules override conflicting state rules thought to be substantive in nature in cases in which state law supplies the rule of decision. 6 In response to this controversy Congress has passed a bill postponing the rules'

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

On November 20, 1972, the Supreme Court promulgated a new federal evidentiary code,' to become effective July 1, 1973, unless Congress took supervening action. 2 It was then for Congress to determine, if only by inaction, whether the proposed Federal Rules of Evidence would control trials of cases in federal courts.It was widely anticipated that Congress would, as a matter of course, allow the proposed rules to take effcct. 3 However, despite the submission to the profession of substantially similar preliminary drafts in 19691 and in 1971, 5 the proposed rules have recently become the focus of criticism.The controversy centers for the most part upon two issues: first, whether procedural evidentiary rules have been used to effect substantive changes in the law; and second, whether the new rules override conflicting state rules thought to be substantive in nature in cases in which state law supplies the rule of decision. 6 In response to this controversy Congress has passed a bill postponing the rules'

Key concepts: Law, Choice of law, Political science, Law and economics, Economics, Conflict of laws

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Choice of Law and the Proposed Federal Rules of Evidence: New Perspectives — Research Paper | ScholarLens