Characterising tree-based phylogenetic networks
Laura Jetten
Abstract
Open-access reader
Laura Jetten
Abstract
Open-access reader
Commonly, the evolutionary history of a set of taxa is described by a phylogenetic tree. However, in certain cases, evolution can best be described by a phylogenetic network. In previous research, the term tree-based was introduced for a phylogenetic network, meaning that it can be drawn as a phylogenetic tree with additional horizontal arcs. In particular, an algorithm was given to determine whether a binary network is tree-based or not. Here we give a simple graph-theoretic classification of all tree-based and non-tree-based binary phylogenetic networks. In addition, we give an upper bound on how many leaves need to be added to make any binary network tree-based. We also give an upper bound for the number of base trees that a tree-based binary phylogenetic network contains. Finally, since there has not been done any previous research on the tree-basedness of non-binary phylogenetic networks, some theorems of the binary case are studied and checked whether they also apply in the non-binary case. We show that some of these theorems apply in the non-binary case and some do not. In particular, we give a classification for non-binary phylogenetic networks that are tree-based.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Commonly, the evolutionary history of a set of taxa is described by a phylogenetic tree. However, in certain cases, evolution can best be described by a phylogenetic network. In previous research, the term tree-based was introduced for a phylogenetic network, meaning that it can be drawn as a phylogenetic tree with additional horizontal arcs. In particular, an algorithm was given to determine whether a binary network is tree-based or not. Here we give a simple graph-theoretic classification of all tree-based and non-tree-based binary phylogenetic networks. In addition, we give an upper bound on how many leaves need to be added to make any binary network tree-based. We also give an upper bound for the number of base trees that a tree-based binary phylogenetic network contains. Finally, since there has not been done any previous research on the tree-basedness of non-binary phylogenetic networks, some theorems of the binary case are studied and checked whether they also apply in the non-binary case. We show that some of these theorems apply in the non-binary case and some do not. In particular, we give a classification for non-binary phylogenetic networks that are tree-based.
Key concepts: Phylogenetic tree, Tree rearrangement, Phylogenetic network, Random binary tree, Tree (set theory), Binary tree, K-ary tree, Computational phylogenetics