2015Research Repository (Delft University of Technology)Open access

Characterising tree-based phylogenetic networks

Laura Jetten

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

Commonly, the evolutionary history of a set of taxa is described by a phylogenetic tree. However, in certain cases, evolution can best be described by a phylogenetic network. In previous research, the term tree-based was introduced for a phylogenetic network, meaning that it can be drawn as a phylogenetic tree with additional horizontal arcs. In particular, an algorithm was given to determine whether a binary network is tree-based or not. Here we give a simple graph-theoretic classification of all tree-based and non-tree-based binary phylogenetic networks. In addition, we give an upper bound on how many leaves need to be added to make any binary network tree-based. We also give an upper bound for the number of base trees that a tree-based binary phylogenetic network contains. Finally, since there has not been done any previous research on the tree-basedness of non-binary phylogenetic networks, some theorems of the binary case are studied and checked whether they also apply in the non-binary case. We show that some of these theorems apply in the non-binary case and some do not. In particular, we give a classification for non-binary phylogenetic networks that are tree-based.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Commonly, the evolutionary history of a set of taxa is described by a phylogenetic tree. However, in certain cases, evolution can best be described by a phylogenetic network. In previous research, the term tree-based was introduced for a phylogenetic network, meaning that it can be drawn as a phylogenetic tree with additional horizontal arcs. In particular, an algorithm was given to determine whether a binary network is tree-based or not. Here we give a simple graph-theoretic classification of all tree-based and non-tree-based binary phylogenetic networks. In addition, we give an upper bound on how many leaves need to be added to make any binary network tree-based. We also give an upper bound for the number of base trees that a tree-based binary phylogenetic network contains. Finally, since there has not been done any previous research on the tree-basedness of non-binary phylogenetic networks, some theorems of the binary case are studied and checked whether they also apply in the non-binary case. We show that some of these theorems apply in the non-binary case and some do not. In particular, we give a classification for non-binary phylogenetic networks that are tree-based.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Commonly, the evolutionary history of a set of taxa is described by a phylogenetic tree. However, in certain cases, evolution can best be described by a phylogenetic network. In previous research, the term tree-based was introduced for a phylogenetic network, meaning that it can be drawn as a phylogenetic tree with additional horizontal arcs. In particular, an algorithm was given to determine whether a binary network is tree-based or not. Here we give a simple graph-theoretic classification of all tree-based and non-tree-based binary phylogenetic networks. In addition, we give an upper bound on how many leaves need to be added to make any binary network tree-based. We also give an upper bound for the number of base trees that a tree-based binary phylogenetic network contains. Finally, since there has not been done any previous research on the tree-basedness of non-binary phylogenetic networks, some theorems of the binary case are studied and checked whether they also apply in the non-binary case. We show that some of these theorems apply in the non-binary case and some do not. In particular, we give a classification for non-binary phylogenetic networks that are tree-based.

Key concepts: Phylogenetic tree, Tree rearrangement, Phylogenetic network, Random binary tree, Tree (set theory), Binary tree, K-ary tree, Computational phylogenetics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Characterising tree-based phylogenetic networks — Research Paper | ScholarLens