2006Asian Journal of Technology InnovationRequires access

Analysis on the multi‐technology capabilities of Korea and Taiwan using patent bibliometrics

Jung‐Tae Hwang, Byung‐Keun Kim

Open publisher page 14 citations

Abstract

Summary This paper explores multi‐technology capabilities between Korea and Taiwan by analyzing the pattern of inventive activities concerning technology fusion by using patent bibliometrics. Although two countries exhibit a similar level of invention activities and high degree of specialization in emerging technologies measured by the number and technological fields of their US patents, innovation systems in two countries differ. MTCs (multi‐technology corporations) are stronger in Korea national innovation system while small innovative firms play important roles in Taiwan national innovation system. Technology fusion has been an important source of technological innovation, and it suggests possible advantage for the Korean innovation system because it is a common belief that global size firms ‐ most of them are multi‐technology corporations ‐ can perform better in multi‐technology fusion and scientific research. The result of patent bibliometrics suggests rather complex answers to the belief. Even though Korea shows slight advantage, it may not be ascribed to the large MTCs.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Summary This paper explores multi‐technology capabilities between Korea and Taiwan by analyzing the pattern of inventive activities concerning technology fusion by using patent bibliometrics. Although two countries exhibit a similar level of invention activities and high degree of specialization in emerging technologies measured by the number and technological fields of their US patents, innovation systems in two countries differ. MTCs (multi‐technology corporations) are stronger in Korea national innovation system while small innovative firms play important roles in Taiwan national innovation system. Technology fusion has been an important source of technological innovation, and it suggests possible advantage for the Korean innovation system because it is a common belief that global size firms ‐ most of them are multi‐technology corporations ‐ can perform better in multi‐technology fusion and scientific research. The result of patent bibliometrics suggests rather complex answers to the belief. Even though Korea shows slight advantage, it may not be ascribed to the large MTCs.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Summary This paper explores multi‐technology capabilities between Korea and Taiwan by analyzing the pattern of inventive activities concerning technology fusion by using patent bibliometrics. Although two countries exhibit a similar level of invention activities and high degree of specialization in emerging technologies measured by the number and technological fields of their US patents, innovation systems in two countries differ. MTCs (multi‐technology corporations) are stronger in Korea national innovation system while small innovative firms play important roles in Taiwan national innovation system. Technology fusion has been an important source of technological innovation, and it suggests possible advantage for the Korean innovation system because it is a common belief that global size firms ‐ most of them are multi‐technology corporations ‐ can perform better in multi‐technology fusion and scientific research. The result of patent bibliometrics suggests rather complex answers to the belief. Even though Korea shows slight advantage, it may not be ascribed to the large MTCs.

Key concepts: Bibliometrics, Patent analysis, Business, Innovation system, National innovation system, Technology innovation, Industrial organization, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Analysis on the multi‐technology capabilities of Korea and Taiwan using patent bibliometrics — Research Paper | ScholarLens