1993•Civil engineeringRequires access

The ‘Criminalization‘ of Government Procurement

Richard D. Lieberman

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Laws and regulations governing federal government contracts are proliferating. Every firm that does business with a federal agency should have an internal program to prevent violation of laws that now make some actions criminal. Between 1984 and 1990, the government’s procurement regulatory system, the Federal Acquisition Regulation, grew by 43% in page count in the Federal Register. This “criminalization” of the federal procurement process can affect any firm, even if it only has five employees. New sentencing guidelines for organizations that became effective in November 1991, raised fines up to four times, but states that a firm’s fine can be reduced up to 25% if an effective compliance program is in place. A list of suggestions for such a compliance programs is offered. Among the components are a company ethics, a training program, a company “hotline” or other mechanism for reporting suspected wrongdoing, effective discipline when employees are found to be violating codes, and other similar provisions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Laws and regulations governing federal government contracts are proliferating. Every firm that does business with a federal agency should have an internal program to prevent violation of laws that now make some actions criminal. Between 1984 and 1990, the government’s procurement regulatory system, the Federal Acquisition Regulation, grew by 43% in page count in the Federal Register. This “criminalization” of the federal procurement process can affect any firm, even if it only has five employees. New sentencing guidelines for organizations that became effective in November 1991, raised fines up to four times, but states that a firm’s fine can be reduced up to 25% if an effective compliance program is in place. A list of suggestions for such a compliance programs is offered. Among the components are a company ethics, a training program, a company “hotline” or other mechanism for reporting suspected wrongdoing, effective discipline when employees are found to be violating codes, and other similar provisions.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Laws and regulations governing federal government contracts are proliferating. Every firm that does business with a federal agency should have an internal program to prevent violation of laws that now make some actions criminal. Between 1984 and 1990, the government’s procurement regulatory system, the Federal Acquisition Regulation, grew by 43% in page count in the Federal Register. This “criminalization” of the federal procurement process can affect any firm, even if it only has five employees. New sentencing guidelines for organizations that became effective in November 1991, raised fines up to four times, but states that a firm’s fine can be reduced up to 25% if an effective compliance program is in place. A list of suggestions for such a compliance programs is offered. Among the components are a company ethics, a training program, a company “hotline” or other mechanism for reporting suspected wrongdoing, effective discipline when employees are found to be violating codes, and other similar provisions.

Key concepts: Government procurement, Wrongdoing, Procurement, Criminalization, Hotline, Business, Government (linguistics), Agency (philosophy)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The ‘Criminalization‘ of Government Procurement — Research Paper | ScholarLens