Corporate Debt Behavior in South Africa: Pecking Order or Target Adjustment?
Chia Chao Wu, Minga Negash
Abstract
Chia Chao Wu, Minga Negash
Abstract
Traditional trade off models of capital structure advocated that the gains from leverage be balanced against the potential costs of distress and bankruptcy. More recent studies however show that the trade off theory does not fully explain the behavior of South African managers. Using JSE industrial sector data, this paper replicates the Shyam-Sunder and Myers (1999) work to identify whether trade off theory or pecking order theory explains the behavior of South African managers better. Results indicated that both models are useful, but pecking order dominates the target adjustment model for small sized firms.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Traditional trade off models of capital structure advocated that the gains from leverage be balanced against the potential costs of distress and bankruptcy. More recent studies however show that the trade off theory does not fully explain the behavior of South African managers. Using JSE industrial sector data, this paper replicates the Shyam-Sunder and Myers (1999) work to identify whether trade off theory or pecking order theory explains the behavior of South African managers better. Results indicated that both models are useful, but pecking order dominates the target adjustment model for small sized firms.
Key concepts: Pecking order, Pecking order theory, Leverage (statistics), Bankruptcy, Capital structure, Debt, Order (exchange), Economics