2002•SSRN Electronic JournalOpen access

Corporate Debt Behavior in South Africa: Pecking Order or Target Adjustment?

Chia Chao Wu, Minga Negash

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Traditional trade off models of capital structure advocated that the gains from leverage be balanced against the potential costs of distress and bankruptcy. More recent studies however show that the trade off theory does not fully explain the behavior of South African managers. Using JSE industrial sector data, this paper replicates the Shyam-Sunder and Myers (1999) work to identify whether trade off theory or pecking order theory explains the behavior of South African managers better. Results indicated that both models are useful, but pecking order dominates the target adjustment model for small sized firms.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Traditional trade off models of capital structure advocated that the gains from leverage be balanced against the potential costs of distress and bankruptcy. More recent studies however show that the trade off theory does not fully explain the behavior of South African managers. Using JSE industrial sector data, this paper replicates the Shyam-Sunder and Myers (1999) work to identify whether trade off theory or pecking order theory explains the behavior of South African managers better. Results indicated that both models are useful, but pecking order dominates the target adjustment model for small sized firms.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Traditional trade off models of capital structure advocated that the gains from leverage be balanced against the potential costs of distress and bankruptcy. More recent studies however show that the trade off theory does not fully explain the behavior of South African managers. Using JSE industrial sector data, this paper replicates the Shyam-Sunder and Myers (1999) work to identify whether trade off theory or pecking order theory explains the behavior of South African managers better. Results indicated that both models are useful, but pecking order dominates the target adjustment model for small sized firms.

Key concepts: Pecking order, Pecking order theory, Leverage (statistics), Bankruptcy, Capital structure, Debt, Order (exchange), Economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Corporate Debt Behavior in South Africa: Pecking Order or Target Adjustment? — Research Paper | ScholarLens