2010Trends in Biosciences/Trends in biosciencesRequires access

Efficacy of Spinosad and Neem Products Against Shoot and Fruit Borer (Leucinodes orbonalis Guen.) of Brinjal (Solanum melongena L.)

Anoorag R. Tayde, Sobita Simon

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during kharif, 2009–2010 at SHIATS, Allahabad (U.P.) to compare the efficacy of insecticides, Spinosad and neem products against brinjal shoot and fruit borer, (Leucinodes orbonalis Guen.) which reveled that Spinosad 45 SC @ 0.01% was found most effective and showed (09.84%) shoot infestation, per cent fruit infestation (06.87% on number basis and 07.35% on weight basis) and increasing yield of brinjal fruit (239.30 q/ha). Whereas, Carbaryl 50 WP @ 0.2% and Endosulfan 35 EC @ 0.05% were also found effective in reducing per cent infestation shoot and fruit infestation and increasing yield. Amongst neem products NSKE 5% was found to be superior in terms of efficacy and yield. However, the increment cost benefit ratio (ICBR) showed that the application of Quinalphos 25 EC @ 0.05% was economically most viable treatment (1:67.86) followed by Endosulfan 35 EC @ 0.05% (1:66.19).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A field experiment was conducted during kharif, 2009–2010 at SHIATS, Allahabad (U.P.) to compare the efficacy of insecticides, Spinosad and neem products against brinjal shoot and fruit borer, (Leucinodes orbonalis Guen.) which reveled that Spinosad 45 SC @ 0.01% was found most effective and showed (09.84%) shoot infestation, per cent fruit infestation (06.87% on number basis and 07.35% on weight basis) and increasing yield of brinjal fruit (239.30 q/ha). Whereas, Carbaryl 50 WP @ 0.2% and Endosulfan 35 EC @ 0.05% were also found effective in reducing per cent infestation shoot and fruit infestation and increasing yield. Amongst neem products NSKE 5% was found to be superior in terms of efficacy and yield. However, the increment cost benefit ratio (ICBR) showed that the application of Quinalphos 25 EC @ 0.05% was economically most viable treatment (1:67.86) followed by Endosulfan 35 EC @ 0.05% (1:66.19).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A field experiment was conducted during kharif, 2009–2010 at SHIATS, Allahabad (U.P.) to compare the efficacy of insecticides, Spinosad and neem products against brinjal shoot and fruit borer, (Leucinodes orbonalis Guen.) which reveled that Spinosad 45 SC @ 0.01% was found most effective and showed (09.84%) shoot infestation, per cent fruit infestation (06.87% on number basis and 07.35% on weight basis) and increasing yield of brinjal fruit (239.30 q/ha). Whereas, Carbaryl 50 WP @ 0.2% and Endosulfan 35 EC @ 0.05% were also found effective in reducing per cent infestation shoot and fruit infestation and increasing yield. Amongst neem products NSKE 5% was found to be superior in terms of efficacy and yield. However, the increment cost benefit ratio (ICBR) showed that the application of Quinalphos 25 EC @ 0.05% was economically most viable treatment (1:67.86) followed by Endosulfan 35 EC @ 0.05% (1:66.19).

Key concepts: Leucinodes orbonalis, Spinosad, Melongena, Infestation, Solanum, Toxicology, Shoot, Azadirachtin

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Efficacy of Spinosad and Neem Products Against Shoot and Fruit Borer (Leucinodes orbonalis Guen.) of Brinjal (Solanum melongena L.) — Research Paper | ScholarLens