1985•Journal of International Medical ResearchRequires access

A Double-Blind Crossover Evaluation of Naproxen and Piroxicam in Osteoarthritis of Hip or Knee

Jan-Magnus Björkenheim, JOHN R. HELLAND, Jari I. Peltonen

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

Seventy-five patients participated in a randomized, double-blind, crossover study, the aim of which was to compare the efficacy and safety of naproxen 1000 mg once daily with piroxicam 20 mg once daily for the treatment of osteoarthritis of hip or knee. Treatment periods of 4 weeks each were preceded by placebo wash-out periods of up to 1 week. The patients were examined clinically at every stage of the trial. Each treatment group exhibited significant improvement in weight-bearing and night pain, over-all disease severity, and the separate evaluations of patient response by physician and patient. There were no significant differences between the drugs in type, severity, or number of side-effects. Neither of the drugs influenced the patients' laboratory data. Night pain was less for patients using naproxen than for those taking piroxicam, and patients indicated greater preference for naproxen than for piroxicam. Naproxen was statistically superior to piroxicam as measured by decreased weight-bearing pain and over-all disease severity, the separate physician and patient global assessments of patient response to therapy, and physician preference. In this study, naproxen 1000 mg once daily was more effective than piroxicam 20 mg once daily for the treatment of osteoarthritis.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Seventy-five patients participated in a randomized, double-blind, crossover study, the aim of which was to compare the efficacy and safety of naproxen 1000 mg once daily with piroxicam 20 mg once daily for the treatment of osteoarthritis of hip or knee. Treatment periods of 4 weeks each were preceded by placebo wash-out periods of up to 1 week. The patients were examined clinically at every stage of the trial. Each treatment group exhibited significant improvement in weight-bearing and night pain, over-all disease severity, and the separate evaluations of patient response by physician and patient. There were no significant differences between the drugs in type, severity, or number of side-effects. Neither of the drugs influenced the patients' laboratory data. Night pain was less for patients using naproxen than for those taking piroxicam, and patients indicated greater preference for naproxen than for piroxicam. Naproxen was statistically superior to piroxicam as measured by decreased weight-bearing pain and over-all disease severity, the separate physician and patient global assessments of patient response to therapy, and physician preference. In this study, naproxen 1000 mg once daily was more effective than piroxicam 20 mg once daily for the treatment of osteoarthritis.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Seventy-five patients participated in a randomized, double-blind, crossover study, the aim of which was to compare the efficacy and safety of naproxen 1000 mg once daily with piroxicam 20 mg once daily for the treatment of osteoarthritis of hip or knee. Treatment periods of 4 weeks each were preceded by placebo wash-out periods of up to 1 week. The patients were examined clinically at every stage of the trial. Each treatment group exhibited significant improvement in weight-bearing and night pain, over-all disease severity, and the separate evaluations of patient response by physician and patient. There were no significant differences between the drugs in type, severity, or number of side-effects. Neither of the drugs influenced the patients' laboratory data. Night pain was less for patients using naproxen than for those taking piroxicam, and patients indicated greater preference for naproxen than for piroxicam. Naproxen was statistically superior to piroxicam as measured by decreased weight-bearing pain and over-all disease severity, the separate physician and patient global assessments of patient response to therapy, and physician preference. In this study, naproxen 1000 mg once daily was more effective than piroxicam 20 mg once daily for the treatment of osteoarthritis.

Key concepts: Medicine, Piroxicam, Osteoarthritis, Naproxen, Crossover study, Double blind, Anesthesia, Physical therapy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Double-Blind Crossover Evaluation of Naproxen and Piroxicam in Osteoarthritis of Hip or Knee — Research Paper | ScholarLens