2015IEEE Transactions on CommunicationsRequires access

Comparison of Convolutional and Block Codes for Low Structural Delay

Christoph Rachinger, Johannes B. Huber, Ralf R. Müller

Open publisher page 46 citations

Abstract

The performance of short block length low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes (both binary and nonbinary) and convolutional codes is compared under the constraint of tight structural delay constraints. Additionally, we use fundamental bounds on block codes and low rate turbo codes to evaluate our results in a broader context. It turns out that-depending on the code rate and given delay-convolutional codes are able to outperform fundamental lower bounds for block codes, yielding a definite result on the question, which codes are superior in this regime. From a break-even point onward, convolutional codes cannot compete with block codes anymore and nonbinary LDPC codes show the best performance. Turbo codes with a short interleaver length show competitive results.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The performance of short block length low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes (both binary and nonbinary) and convolutional codes is compared under the constraint of tight structural delay constraints. Additionally, we use fundamental bounds on block codes and low rate turbo codes to evaluate our results in a broader context. It turns out that-depending on the code rate and given delay-convolutional codes are able to outperform fundamental lower bounds for block codes, yielding a definite result on the question, which codes are superior in this regime. From a break-even point onward, convolutional codes cannot compete with block codes anymore and nonbinary LDPC codes show the best performance. Turbo codes with a short interleaver length show competitive results.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 46 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The performance of short block length low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes (both binary and nonbinary) and convolutional codes is compared under the constraint of tight structural delay constraints. Additionally, we use fundamental bounds on block codes and low rate turbo codes to evaluate our results in a broader context. It turns out that-depending on the code rate and given delay-convolutional codes are able to outperform fundamental lower bounds for block codes, yielding a definite result on the question, which codes are superior in this regime. From a break-even point onward, convolutional codes cannot compete with block codes anymore and nonbinary LDPC codes show the best performance. Turbo codes with a short interleaver length show competitive results.

Key concepts: Turbo code, Serial concatenated convolutional codes, Block code, Convolutional code, Concatenated error correction code, Linear code, Low-density parity-check code, Tornado code

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of Convolutional and Block Codes for Low Structural Delay — Research Paper | ScholarLens