2014β€’Cross Connect (Southern Cross University)Requires access

EARTHQUAKE MAXIMUM MAGNITUDE ESTIMATION CONSIDERING REGIONAL SEISMOTECTONIC PARAMETERS

P. Anbazhagan, Nairwita Dutta, Ketan Bajaj, Sayed S. R. Moustafa, Nassir Al‐Arifi

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to estimate the maximum magnitude (π‘€π‘šπ‘Žπ‘₯) which is defined as the upper limit of earthquake magnitude for a given region by a new approach considering regional rupture characteristics. The proposed method has been explained in details and examined for an active seismic region. Seismic study area (SSA) has been generated by dividing into radii of 200 km and 500 km, based on the seismicity and seismotectonics. The regional rupture character has been established by considering Percentage Fault Rupture (PFR), which is the ratio of subsurface rupture length (RLD) to Total Fault Length (TFL) expressed in percentage. PFR is used for determining RLD, which is further used for estimating the maximum magnitude for each source. Maximum magnitude for SSA of Kanpur region has been estimated and compared with the π‘€π‘šπ‘Žπ‘₯ values from existing methods. It is observed from the study that the existing deterministic and probabilistic π‘€π‘šπ‘Žπ‘₯ estimation methods are sensitive to SSA radius, magnitude of completeness (𝑀𝑐 ), β€˜π‘Žβ€™ and β€˜π‘β€™ parameters and π‘€π‘šπ‘Žπ‘₯ π‘œπ‘π‘  values. However, π‘€π‘šπ‘Žπ‘₯ from the proposed method is a function of the rupture character and is irrespective of the SSA and 𝑀𝑐, β€˜π‘Žβ€™ and β€˜π‘β€™ parameters and π‘€π‘šπ‘Žπ‘₯ π‘œπ‘π‘  values.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The objective of this paper is to estimate the maximum magnitude (π‘€π‘šπ‘Žπ‘₯) which is defined as the upper limit of earthquake magnitude for a given region by a new approach considering regional rupture characteristics. The proposed method has been explained in details and examined for an active seismic region. Seismic study area (SSA) has been generated by dividing into radii of 200 km and 500 km, based on the seismicity and seismotectonics. The regional rupture character has been established by considering Percentage Fault Rupture (PFR), which is the ratio of subsurface rupture length (RLD) to Total Fault Length (TFL) expressed in percentage. PFR is used for determining RLD, which is further used for estimating the maximum magnitude for each source. Maximum magnitude for SSA of Kanpur region has been estimated and compared with the π‘€π‘šπ‘Žπ‘₯ values from existing methods. It is observed from the study that the existing deterministic and probabilistic π‘€π‘šπ‘Žπ‘₯ estimation methods are sensitive to SSA radius, magnitude of completeness (𝑀𝑐 ), β€˜π‘Žβ€™ and β€˜π‘β€™ parameters and π‘€π‘šπ‘Žπ‘₯ π‘œπ‘π‘  values. However, π‘€π‘šπ‘Žπ‘₯ from the proposed method is a function of the rupture character and is irrespective of the SSA and 𝑀𝑐, β€˜π‘Žβ€™ and β€˜π‘β€™ parameters and π‘€π‘šπ‘Žπ‘₯ π‘œπ‘π‘  values.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The objective of this paper is to estimate the maximum magnitude (π‘€π‘šπ‘Žπ‘₯) which is defined as the upper limit of earthquake magnitude for a given region by a new approach considering regional rupture characteristics. The proposed method has been explained in details and examined for an active seismic region. Seismic study area (SSA) has been generated by dividing into radii of 200 km and 500 km, based on the seismicity and seismotectonics. The regional rupture character has been established by considering Percentage Fault Rupture (PFR), which is the ratio of subsurface rupture length (RLD) to Total Fault Length (TFL) expressed in percentage. PFR is used for determining RLD, which is further used for estimating the maximum magnitude for each source. Maximum magnitude for SSA of Kanpur region has been estimated and compared with the π‘€π‘šπ‘Žπ‘₯ values from existing methods. It is observed from the study that the existing deterministic and probabilistic π‘€π‘šπ‘Žπ‘₯ estimation methods are sensitive to SSA radius, magnitude of completeness (𝑀𝑐 ), β€˜π‘Žβ€™ and β€˜π‘β€™ parameters and π‘€π‘šπ‘Žπ‘₯ π‘œπ‘π‘  values. However, π‘€π‘šπ‘Žπ‘₯ from the proposed method is a function of the rupture character and is irrespective of the SSA and 𝑀𝑐, β€˜π‘Žβ€™ and β€˜π‘β€™ parameters and π‘€π‘šπ‘Žπ‘₯ π‘œπ‘π‘  values.

Key concepts: Maximum magnitude, Magnitude (astronomy), Seismotectonics, Geology, Earthquake magnitude, Seismology, Induced seismicity, RADIUS

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
EARTHQUAKE MAXIMUM MAGNITUDE ESTIMATION CONSIDERING REGIONAL SEISMOTECTONIC PARAMETERS β€” Research Paper | ScholarLens