2011Indian Journal of Animal NutritionOpen access

Evaluation of Thumero (Lagerstroemia speciosa) Loppings in Mithun (Bos frontalis) Rations

Kobu Khate, Vijay Kumar Vidyarthi, B. Prakash, C. Rajkhowa, V. B. Sharma

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Four adult male mithuns (av. BW 336.8 ± 10.84 kg) were randomly fed on paddy straw based total mixed ration (roughage: concentrate 50:50- Control, R1), however in treatment rations R2, R3 and R4 10, 20 and 30% of concentrate portion was replaced by thumero (Lagerstroemia speciosa) loppings (w/w). All the rations were densified into feed blocks and fed to mithuns for 21 days and thereafter a metabolism trial was conducted following a Latin Square Switch Over Design. Mean DM intake did not vary significantly among rations, however water intake was significantly (P<0.01) higher on ration R2. The digestibility of DM, OM, CP, CF and NFE did not vary among rations; however, the EE digestibility of ration R3 was higher (P<0.05) than other rations. Animals fed on different rations were in positive N balance, however, those on ration R2 had higher (P<0.05) balance. DCP and TDN intakes were significantly (P<0.05) higher on ration R2 however, variation among rations R1, R3 and R4 was not significant.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Four adult male mithuns (av. BW 336.8 ± 10.84 kg) were randomly fed on paddy straw based total mixed ration (roughage: concentrate 50:50- Control, R1), however in treatment rations R2, R3 and R4 10, 20 and 30% of concentrate portion was replaced by thumero (Lagerstroemia speciosa) loppings (w/w). All the rations were densified into feed blocks and fed to mithuns for 21 days and thereafter a metabolism trial was conducted following a Latin Square Switch Over Design. Mean DM intake did not vary significantly among rations, however water intake was significantly (P<0.01) higher on ration R2. The digestibility of DM, OM, CP, CF and NFE did not vary among rations; however, the EE digestibility of ration R3 was higher (P<0.05) than other rations. Animals fed on different rations were in positive N balance, however, those on ration R2 had higher (P<0.05) balance. DCP and TDN intakes were significantly (P<0.05) higher on ration R2 however, variation among rations R1, R3 and R4 was not significant.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Four adult male mithuns (av. BW 336.8 ± 10.84 kg) were randomly fed on paddy straw based total mixed ration (roughage: concentrate 50:50- Control, R1), however in treatment rations R2, R3 and R4 10, 20 and 30% of concentrate portion was replaced by thumero (Lagerstroemia speciosa) loppings (w/w). All the rations were densified into feed blocks and fed to mithuns for 21 days and thereafter a metabolism trial was conducted following a Latin Square Switch Over Design. Mean DM intake did not vary significantly among rations, however water intake was significantly (P<0.01) higher on ration R2. The digestibility of DM, OM, CP, CF and NFE did not vary among rations; however, the EE digestibility of ration R3 was higher (P<0.05) than other rations. Animals fed on different rations were in positive N balance, however, those on ration R2 had higher (P<0.05) balance. DCP and TDN intakes were significantly (P<0.05) higher on ration R2 however, variation among rations R1, R3 and R4 was not significant.

Key concepts: Latin square, Straw, Animal science, Veterinary medicine, Medicine, Biology, Rumen, Food science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of Thumero (Lagerstroemia speciosa) Loppings in Mithun (Bos frontalis) Rations — Research Paper | ScholarLens