2015Journal of Visual Art PracticeOpen access

Art theory – handmaiden of neoliberalism?

Naomi Salaman

Open full text 17 citations

Abstract

The Art&Language Art Theory course proposal of 1969 was an incisive ideological exposé of the restructuring of art school education as university-level education, as a result of the Coldstream Report of 1960. I consider this course proposal together with a paper written by Terry Atkinson some 30 years later, addressed to the Fine Art Board at the University of Brighton reflecting on the reach of art theory in fine art education in 2002. Both Atkinson texts critique the institutional divide that structures fine art education into studio and academic work, which I consider historically, ideologically and from a feminist perspective. Finally, I consider the current dynamics of art theory in fine art education, describing a shift in emphasis and exchange value suggested by a recent article International Art English, on the rise – and the space – of the art-world press release by Alix Rule and David Levine, published in 2012.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The Art&Language Art Theory course proposal of 1969 was an incisive ideological exposé of the restructuring of art school education as university-level education, as a result of the Coldstream Report of 1960. I consider this course proposal together with a paper written by Terry Atkinson some 30 years later, addressed to the Fine Art Board at the University of Brighton reflecting on the reach of art theory in fine art education in 2002. Both Atkinson texts critique the institutional divide that structures fine art education into studio and academic work, which I consider historically, ideologically and from a feminist perspective. Finally, I consider the current dynamics of art theory in fine art education, describing a shift in emphasis and exchange value suggested by a recent article International Art English, on the rise – and the space – of the art-world press release by Alix Rule and David Levine, published in 2012.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 17 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The Art&Language Art Theory course proposal of 1969 was an incisive ideological exposé of the restructuring of art school education as university-level education, as a result of the Coldstream Report of 1960. I consider this course proposal together with a paper written by Terry Atkinson some 30 years later, addressed to the Fine Art Board at the University of Brighton reflecting on the reach of art theory in fine art education in 2002. Both Atkinson texts critique the institutional divide that structures fine art education into studio and academic work, which I consider historically, ideologically and from a feminist perspective. Finally, I consider the current dynamics of art theory in fine art education, describing a shift in emphasis and exchange value suggested by a recent article International Art English, on the rise – and the space – of the art-world press release by Alix Rule and David Levine, published in 2012.

Key concepts: Visual arts education, Art methodology, Contemporary art, Environmental art, Art world, Ideology, Sociology, Studio

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Art theory – handmaiden of neoliberalism? — Research Paper | ScholarLens