2007•SSRN Electronic JournalOpen access

Impact of Information and Communication Technologies on the General Meeting of Shareholders of Spanish Corporations

Andrés Recalde Castells

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

The current debate on good corporate governance revisits the proposals to intensify internal controls throughout the General Meeting of Shareholders and by minority shareholders. These proposals stress the need for enlargement of competences of the General Shareholder Meeting. They also encourage the adoption of new mechanisms aiming to promote the exercise of minority shareholders' rights, and particularly, the right to vote. The latter could be achieved mainly by means of technologies enabling remote voting. The Spanish Law of Transparency of 2003 modified the Public Limited Liability Companies Act of 1989 and introduced the possibility of remote voting and voting delegation not only by post, but also by electronic means. Nevertheless, regulation is not detailed and it leaves a wide margin for self-regulation. The analysis of the voting systems used by most of the Spanish corporations cast doubts on its efficiency in increasing General Meeting of Shareholders control. In addition, this paper questions whether new remote voting systems increase shareholder activism, Although they eliminate the cost of attending the General Meeting of Shareholders where it takes place, they do not affect other costs, which are, arguably, more significant.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The current debate on good corporate governance revisits the proposals to intensify internal controls throughout the General Meeting of Shareholders and by minority shareholders. These proposals stress the need for enlargement of competences of the General Shareholder Meeting. They also encourage the adoption of new mechanisms aiming to promote the exercise of minority shareholders' rights, and particularly, the right to vote. The latter could be achieved mainly by means of technologies enabling remote voting. The Spanish Law of Transparency of 2003 modified the Public Limited Liability Companies Act of 1989 and introduced the possibility of remote voting and voting delegation not only by post, but also by electronic means. Nevertheless, regulation is not detailed and it leaves a wide margin for self-regulation. The analysis of the voting systems used by most of the Spanish corporations cast doubts on its efficiency in increasing General Meeting of Shareholders control. In addition, this paper questions whether new remote voting systems increase shareholder activism, Although they eliminate the cost of attending the General Meeting of Shareholders where it takes place, they do not affect other costs, which are, arguably, more significant.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The current debate on good corporate governance revisits the proposals to intensify internal controls throughout the General Meeting of Shareholders and by minority shareholders. These proposals stress the need for enlargement of competences of the General Shareholder Meeting. They also encourage the adoption of new mechanisms aiming to promote the exercise of minority shareholders' rights, and particularly, the right to vote. The latter could be achieved mainly by means of technologies enabling remote voting. The Spanish Law of Transparency of 2003 modified the Public Limited Liability Companies Act of 1989 and introduced the possibility of remote voting and voting delegation not only by post, but also by electronic means. Nevertheless, regulation is not detailed and it leaves a wide margin for self-regulation. The analysis of the voting systems used by most of the Spanish corporations cast doubts on its efficiency in increasing General Meeting of Shareholders control. In addition, this paper questions whether new remote voting systems increase shareholder activism, Although they eliminate the cost of attending the General Meeting of Shareholders where it takes place, they do not affect other costs, which are, arguably, more significant.

Key concepts: Shareholder, Voting, Transparency (behavior), Corporate governance, Business, Accounting, Voting trust, Delegation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Impact of Information and Communication Technologies on the General Meeting of Shareholders of Spanish Corporations — Research Paper | ScholarLens