ScholarLens Back to search
1972•International Journal of AudiologyRequires access

A Comparison of Evoked Response Audiometry and Routine Clinical Audiometry

D. E. Rose, L. W. Keating, LeRoy D. Hedgecock, Kenneth E. Miller, K. K. Schreurs

Open publisher page 13 citations

Abstract

Auditory thresholds were determined by evoked response audiometry (ERA) and by routine clinical audiometry at two frequencies (500 and 2 000 Hz) for 50 adult patients by five audiologists. The differences between ERA results and routine audiometric results in this study suggest caution in the clinical use of data obtained by ERA.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Auditory thresholds were determined by evoked response audiometry (ERA) and by routine clinical audiometry at two frequencies (500 and 2 000 Hz) for 50 adult patients by five audiologists. The differences between ERA results and routine audiometric results in this study suggest caution in the clinical use of data obtained by ERA.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Auditory thresholds were determined by evoked response audiometry (ERA) and by routine clinical audiometry at two frequencies (500 and 2 000 Hz) for 50 adult patients by five audiologists. The differences between ERA results and routine audiometric results in this study suggest caution in the clinical use of data obtained by ERA.

Key concepts: Audiology, Audiometry, Medicine, Hearing loss

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Comparison of Evoked Response Audiometry and Routine Clinical Audiometry — Research Paper | ScholarLens