1978•American Journal of Physiology-Renal PhysiologyRequires access

Factors influencing transepithelial potential difference in mammalian distal tubule

John P. Hayslett, Emile L. Boulpaep, Gerhard Giebisch

Open publisher page 17 citations

Abstract

Studies were performed to examine some electrical properties of the mammalian distal tubule. Experiments were performed to evaluate the influence of changes in ion concentration in luminal fluid on transepithelial potential difference. Variations in the concentration of Na+ and K+, near the physiologic range, resulted in only modest changes in potential difference. During changes in Na+ the average slope, deltaV/ln C2/C1, was -1.52 +/- 0.39 mV and during variations in K+ the slope was -5.60 +/- 0.95 mV. Changes in Cl- concentration had no effect on transepithelial potential difference. Since the sum of transferase numbers did not equal 1, it seems likely that potential difference is influenced by a shunt current due to cellular rheogenic pumps. These data, therefore, indicate that variations in ion concentration in tubular fluid of the mammalian distal tubule do not significantly influence the resting transepithelial potential difference, and they suggest that analysis of permselective properties of the luminal cell membrane by transepithelial electrophysiologic approaches is probably invalid.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Studies were performed to examine some electrical properties of the mammalian distal tubule. Experiments were performed to evaluate the influence of changes in ion concentration in luminal fluid on transepithelial potential difference. Variations in the concentration of Na+ and K+, near the physiologic range, resulted in only modest changes in potential difference. During changes in Na+ the average slope, deltaV/ln C2/C1, was -1.52 +/- 0.39 mV and during variations in K+ the slope was -5.60 +/- 0.95 mV. Changes in Cl- concentration had no effect on transepithelial potential difference. Since the sum of transferase numbers did not equal 1, it seems likely that potential difference is influenced by a shunt current due to cellular rheogenic pumps. These data, therefore, indicate that variations in ion concentration in tubular fluid of the mammalian distal tubule do not significantly influence the resting transepithelial potential difference, and they suggest that analysis of permselective properties of the luminal cell membrane by transepithelial electrophysiologic approaches is probably invalid.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 17 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Studies were performed to examine some electrical properties of the mammalian distal tubule. Experiments were performed to evaluate the influence of changes in ion concentration in luminal fluid on transepithelial potential difference. Variations in the concentration of Na+ and K+, near the physiologic range, resulted in only modest changes in potential difference. During changes in Na+ the average slope, deltaV/ln C2/C1, was -1.52 +/- 0.39 mV and during variations in K+ the slope was -5.60 +/- 0.95 mV. Changes in Cl- concentration had no effect on transepithelial potential difference. Since the sum of transferase numbers did not equal 1, it seems likely that potential difference is influenced by a shunt current due to cellular rheogenic pumps. These data, therefore, indicate that variations in ion concentration in tubular fluid of the mammalian distal tubule do not significantly influence the resting transepithelial potential difference, and they suggest that analysis of permselective properties of the luminal cell membrane by transepithelial electrophysiologic approaches is probably invalid.

Key concepts: Transepithelial potential difference, Potential difference, Membrane potential, Biophysics, Significant difference, Chemistry, Reversal potential, Tubule

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Factors influencing transepithelial potential difference in mammalian distal tubule — Research Paper | ScholarLens