1978Unpublished venueRequires access

HULL FORMS FOR IMPROVED TRANSPORT EFFICIENCY

Ake Williams

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Hull-form studies by the Swedish State Shipbuilding Experimental Tank with regard to propulsive performance, including propeller cavitation and vibration, indicated that for the VLCC's and ULCC's, a forebody with ellipsodial hull form and an afterbody of twin skeg (or twin gondola) shape would give the lowest required shaft horsepower. For the high-powered container/ro-ro ships, where cavitation and vibration problems often occur, and afterbody hull form with free space around the propeller(s) was recommended. The choice of an economic forebody hull form depends strongly on whether a reasonably constant forward draft can be maintained.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Hull-form studies by the Swedish State Shipbuilding Experimental Tank with regard to propulsive performance, including propeller cavitation and vibration, indicated that for the VLCC's and ULCC's, a forebody with ellipsodial hull form and an afterbody of twin skeg (or twin gondola) shape would give the lowest required shaft horsepower. For the high-powered container/ro-ro ships, where cavitation and vibration problems often occur, and afterbody hull form with free space around the propeller(s) was recommended. The choice of an economic forebody hull form depends strongly on whether a reasonably constant forward draft can be maintained.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Hull-form studies by the Swedish State Shipbuilding Experimental Tank with regard to propulsive performance, including propeller cavitation and vibration, indicated that for the VLCC's and ULCC's, a forebody with ellipsodial hull form and an afterbody of twin skeg (or twin gondola) shape would give the lowest required shaft horsepower. For the high-powered container/ro-ro ships, where cavitation and vibration problems often occur, and afterbody hull form with free space around the propeller(s) was recommended. The choice of an economic forebody hull form depends strongly on whether a reasonably constant forward draft can be maintained.

Key concepts: Hull, Propeller, Marine engineering, Engineering, Container (type theory), Cavitation, Propulsive efficiency, Shipbuilding

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
HULL FORMS FOR IMPROVED TRANSPORT EFFICIENCY — Research Paper | ScholarLens