Lymph pressure in rat intestinal lymph duct with lymphatic obstruction
J. S. Lee
Abstract
J. S. Lee
Abstract
Lymph pressure (PL) in the main intestinal lymph duct with obstruction of lymph flow was determined. Under various conditions, the rate of lymph flow (JL) was essentially the same in either A rats (with communications between hepatic and intestinal lymphatics) or B rats (without such communications), but PL of A rats was significantly lower (P less than 0.01) than that of B rats. When the intestine was in the basal state, JL of A and B rats was 0.2-0.3 ml/h per rat, and PL was 1.5 +/- 0.2 and 3.3 +/- 0.2 mm/Hg, respectively. During fluid absorption, JL of A and B rats increased to 0.8-0.9 ml/h, and PL was 2.1 +/- 0.4 and 6.4 +/- 0.7 mmHg, respectively. During intravenous saline infusion, JL of A and B rats increased greatly to approximately 14 ml/h, and PL was 3.1 +/- 0.3 and 10.4 +/- 1.1 mmHg, respectively. The lower PL in A rats is apparently due to the possibility that during lymphatic obstruction most lymph could be drained off by the hepatic lymphatics. In A rats, luminal distension pressure had no effect on PL but in B rats PL decreased when distension pressure was 20 mmHg or higher. Furthermore, lymph pressure waves indicate the occurrence of rhythmical contractions of the lymph duct or its surrounding tissues, which may play a role in the propulsion of lymph.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Lymph pressure (PL) in the main intestinal lymph duct with obstruction of lymph flow was determined. Under various conditions, the rate of lymph flow (JL) was essentially the same in either A rats (with communications between hepatic and intestinal lymphatics) or B rats (without such communications), but PL of A rats was significantly lower (P less than 0.01) than that of B rats. When the intestine was in the basal state, JL of A and B rats was 0.2-0.3 ml/h per rat, and PL was 1.5 +/- 0.2 and 3.3 +/- 0.2 mm/Hg, respectively. During fluid absorption, JL of A and B rats increased to 0.8-0.9 ml/h, and PL was 2.1 +/- 0.4 and 6.4 +/- 0.7 mmHg, respectively. During intravenous saline infusion, JL of A and B rats increased greatly to approximately 14 ml/h, and PL was 3.1 +/- 0.3 and 10.4 +/- 1.1 mmHg, respectively. The lower PL in A rats is apparently due to the possibility that during lymphatic obstruction most lymph could be drained off by the hepatic lymphatics. In A rats, luminal distension pressure had no effect on PL but in B rats PL decreased when distension pressure was 20 mmHg or higher. Furthermore, lymph pressure waves indicate the occurrence of rhythmical contractions of the lymph duct or its surrounding tissues, which may play a role in the propulsion of lymph.
Key concepts: Lymph, Lymphatic system, Distension, Medicine, Saline, Pathology, Chemistry, Anatomy