Autonomy and Exception from Informed-Consent Research
C. A. Macardle, Rachel Stanley
Abstract
Open-access reader
C. A. Macardle, Rachel Stanley
Abstract
Open-access reader
The well-recorded historical abuse of biomedical research subjects around the world has led to a lasting distrust of the research system [1]. For this reason, it is usually considered obligatory to acquire informed consent for research studies. The international research community strongly condemns any disregard for proper consenting processes [1]. Because of this requirement, vital emergency medicine (EM) research is hampered by urgent health needs that render patients unable to consent for studies. This has led to a relative dearth of research for emergency treatments.
OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The well-recorded historical abuse of biomedical research subjects around the world has led to a lasting distrust of the research system [1]. For this reason, it is usually considered obligatory to acquire informed consent for research studies. The international research community strongly condemns any disregard for proper consenting processes [1]. Because of this requirement, vital emergency medicine (EM) research is hampered by urgent health needs that render patients unable to consent for studies. This has led to a relative dearth of research for emergency treatments.
Key concepts: Distrust, Informed consent, Autonomy, Research ethics, Medicine, Alternative medicine, Psychology, Political science