2010•Unpublished venueRequires access

Grammaticalization of that-subordinators in English

Sunhee Yae

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

It is generally held that some clause linkage markers have developed on the cline from parataxis through hypotaxis to subordination. As they have evolved from left to right on the cline, the discourse trategy on dependency of the interlocutors has increased. In this study, subordinations indicated by that will be illuminated intensively among others. The two that subordinators such as the complementizer that and the relativizer that originated from the same source, the deictic pronoun that. Their diachronic and synchronic similarities and differences will be diagnosed and compared in the synchronic grammars such as acoustics, phonetics, phonology, syntax, and usage-based corpus in which their historical changes are mirrored. And the mechanisms of grammaticalization will elaborate their differences (epistemic modality and emphasis) and similarities (focus shift and focus fortification) of discourse strategy on dependency.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

It is generally held that some clause linkage markers have developed on the cline from parataxis through hypotaxis to subordination. As they have evolved from left to right on the cline, the discourse trategy on dependency of the interlocutors has increased. In this study, subordinations indicated by that will be illuminated intensively among others. The two that subordinators such as the complementizer that and the relativizer that originated from the same source, the deictic pronoun that. Their diachronic and synchronic similarities and differences will be diagnosed and compared in the synchronic grammars such as acoustics, phonetics, phonology, syntax, and usage-based corpus in which their historical changes are mirrored. And the mechanisms of grammaticalization will elaborate their differences (epistemic modality and emphasis) and similarities (focus shift and focus fortification) of discourse strategy on dependency.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

It is generally held that some clause linkage markers have developed on the cline from parataxis through hypotaxis to subordination. As they have evolved from left to right on the cline, the discourse trategy on dependency of the interlocutors has increased. In this study, subordinations indicated by that will be illuminated intensively among others. The two that subordinators such as the complementizer that and the relativizer that originated from the same source, the deictic pronoun that. Their diachronic and synchronic similarities and differences will be diagnosed and compared in the synchronic grammars such as acoustics, phonetics, phonology, syntax, and usage-based corpus in which their historical changes are mirrored. And the mechanisms of grammaticalization will elaborate their differences (epistemic modality and emphasis) and similarities (focus shift and focus fortification) of discourse strategy on dependency.

Key concepts: Complementizer, Linguistics, Grammaticalization, Focus (optics), Definiteness, Subordination (linguistics), Syntax, Coreference

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Grammaticalization of that-subordinators in English — Research Paper | ScholarLens