1993Journal of the Indian Society of Soil ScienceOpen access

Puddling and Compaction Effects on Water Permeability of Texturally Different Soils

Pradeep Sharma, R.M. Bhagat

Open full text 35 citations

Abstract

Effects of different puddling depths (0, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 cm) and compaction levels on water fluxthrough five texturally different soils (loamy sand, silt loam-I, silt loam-II, loam and clay loam) were studied in 8 cm dia 35 cm long PVC columns. The water flux (q) through nonpuddled (control) soil columns depended largely on the mean weight diameter and bulk density of soil (R2 = 0.715). Puddling decreased ‘q’ as a power function of pudding depth (R2 = 0.908–0.986), while compaction decreased (q) as an exponential function of soil bulk density (K = 0.940–0.991). Effects of puddling and compaction on q were markedly influenced by the clay content of soil. About 95% reduction in q due to per unit increase in puddling depth, and 86% reduction in q due to per unit increase in bulk density, were explained by the linear functions of clay content. At a given puddling depth, the relative waterflux (q-puddled q-nonpuddled) decreased exponentially with the increase in clay content (K = 0.841–0.945); the effects becoming more pronounced at greater pudding depths. Ease of compaction increased while depth of compaction at a given, compactive energy decreased with the fineness of soil texture.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Effects of different puddling depths (0, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 cm) and compaction levels on water fluxthrough five texturally different soils (loamy sand, silt loam-I, silt loam-II, loam and clay loam) were studied in 8 cm dia 35 cm long PVC columns. The water flux (q) through nonpuddled (control) soil columns depended largely on the mean weight diameter and bulk density of soil (R2 = 0.715). Puddling decreased ‘q’ as a power function of pudding depth (R2 = 0.908–0.986), while compaction decreased (q) as an exponential function of soil bulk density (K = 0.940–0.991). Effects of puddling and compaction on q were markedly influenced by the clay content of soil. About 95% reduction in q due to per unit increase in puddling depth, and 86% reduction in q due to per unit increase in bulk density, were explained by the linear functions of clay content. At a given puddling depth, the relative waterflux (q-puddled q-nonpuddled) decreased exponentially with the increase in clay content (K = 0.841–0.945); the effects becoming more pronounced at greater pudding depths. Ease of compaction increased while depth of compaction at a given, compactive energy decreased with the fineness of soil texture.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 35 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Effects of different puddling depths (0, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 cm) and compaction levels on water fluxthrough five texturally different soils (loamy sand, silt loam-I, silt loam-II, loam and clay loam) were studied in 8 cm dia 35 cm long PVC columns. The water flux (q) through nonpuddled (control) soil columns depended largely on the mean weight diameter and bulk density of soil (R2 = 0.715). Puddling decreased ‘q’ as a power function of pudding depth (R2 = 0.908–0.986), while compaction decreased (q) as an exponential function of soil bulk density (K = 0.940–0.991). Effects of puddling and compaction on q were markedly influenced by the clay content of soil. About 95% reduction in q due to per unit increase in puddling depth, and 86% reduction in q due to per unit increase in bulk density, were explained by the linear functions of clay content. At a given puddling depth, the relative waterflux (q-puddled q-nonpuddled) decreased exponentially with the increase in clay content (K = 0.841–0.945); the effects becoming more pronounced at greater pudding depths. Ease of compaction increased while depth of compaction at a given, compactive energy decreased with the fineness of soil texture.

Key concepts: Puddling, Loam, Soil water, Compaction, Bulk density, Silt, Soil science, Soil texture

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Puddling and Compaction Effects on Water Permeability of Texturally Different Soils — Research Paper | ScholarLens