Puddling and Compaction Effects on Water Permeability of Texturally Different Soils
Pradeep Sharma, R.M. Bhagat
Abstract
Pradeep Sharma, R.M. Bhagat
Abstract
Effects of different puddling depths (0, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 cm) and compaction levels on water fluxthrough five texturally different soils (loamy sand, silt loam-I, silt loam-II, loam and clay loam) were studied in 8 cm dia 35 cm long PVC columns. The water flux (q) through nonpuddled (control) soil columns depended largely on the mean weight diameter and bulk density of soil (R2 = 0.715). Puddling decreased ‘q’ as a power function of pudding depth (R2 = 0.908–0.986), while compaction decreased (q) as an exponential function of soil bulk density (K = 0.940–0.991). Effects of puddling and compaction on q were markedly influenced by the clay content of soil. About 95% reduction in q due to per unit increase in puddling depth, and 86% reduction in q due to per unit increase in bulk density, were explained by the linear functions of clay content. At a given puddling depth, the relative waterflux (q-puddled q-nonpuddled) decreased exponentially with the increase in clay content (K = 0.841–0.945); the effects becoming more pronounced at greater pudding depths. Ease of compaction increased while depth of compaction at a given, compactive energy decreased with the fineness of soil texture.
OpenAlex reports 35 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Effects of different puddling depths (0, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 cm) and compaction levels on water fluxthrough five texturally different soils (loamy sand, silt loam-I, silt loam-II, loam and clay loam) were studied in 8 cm dia 35 cm long PVC columns. The water flux (q) through nonpuddled (control) soil columns depended largely on the mean weight diameter and bulk density of soil (R2 = 0.715). Puddling decreased ‘q’ as a power function of pudding depth (R2 = 0.908–0.986), while compaction decreased (q) as an exponential function of soil bulk density (K = 0.940–0.991). Effects of puddling and compaction on q were markedly influenced by the clay content of soil. About 95% reduction in q due to per unit increase in puddling depth, and 86% reduction in q due to per unit increase in bulk density, were explained by the linear functions of clay content. At a given puddling depth, the relative waterflux (q-puddled q-nonpuddled) decreased exponentially with the increase in clay content (K = 0.841–0.945); the effects becoming more pronounced at greater pudding depths. Ease of compaction increased while depth of compaction at a given, compactive energy decreased with the fineness of soil texture.
Key concepts: Puddling, Loam, Soil water, Compaction, Bulk density, Silt, Soil science, Soil texture