2001•ISBS - Conference Proceedings ArchiveRequires access

LOADED BACKPACK POSITIONS AFFECTS TRUNK POSITION DURING WALKING

Donald Sussman, Marika A. Walker, Michael Tamburello, Bonnie VanLunen, E. Dowling, Kristen Bova Campbell, Juan Antonio Flores, R. Ibrahimb, Emily A. Larson

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The effects of backpack loading on lower extremity function was examined. Ten subjects were prepared with a 20 3D-reflective marker set, videotaped by a 4-camera setup, on a level treadmill in four conditions: without backpack (WO), one-strap on right shoulder (1SR), two-strap on back (2SB), and two strap on front (2SF). The videotape was digitized. Significant differences (p <0.05) were found for: head tilt between WO (1.650+ 0.61) compared to 1SR (2.690+0.87); forward trunk lean between WO (7.120+2.16) compared to the mean of all backpack positions (4.260+1.81) and lateral trunk lean between WO (7.220+2.01) compared to the mean of all backpack positions (3.900+1.54). Backpack loading in most any position may require the stretching and strengthening of muscles affected by kinematic changes caused by wearing a loaded backpack.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The effects of backpack loading on lower extremity function was examined. Ten subjects were prepared with a 20 3D-reflective marker set, videotaped by a 4-camera setup, on a level treadmill in four conditions: without backpack (WO), one-strap on right shoulder (1SR), two-strap on back (2SB), and two strap on front (2SF). The videotape was digitized. Significant differences (p <0.05) were found for: head tilt between WO (1.650+ 0.61) compared to 1SR (2.690+0.87); forward trunk lean between WO (7.120+2.16) compared to the mean of all backpack positions (4.260+1.81) and lateral trunk lean between WO (7.220+2.01) compared to the mean of all backpack positions (3.900+1.54). Backpack loading in most any position may require the stretching and strengthening of muscles affected by kinematic changes caused by wearing a loaded backpack.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The effects of backpack loading on lower extremity function was examined. Ten subjects were prepared with a 20 3D-reflective marker set, videotaped by a 4-camera setup, on a level treadmill in four conditions: without backpack (WO), one-strap on right shoulder (1SR), two-strap on back (2SB), and two strap on front (2SF). The videotape was digitized. Significant differences (p <0.05) were found for: head tilt between WO (1.650+ 0.61) compared to 1SR (2.690+0.87); forward trunk lean between WO (7.120+2.16) compared to the mean of all backpack positions (4.260+1.81) and lateral trunk lean between WO (7.220+2.01) compared to the mean of all backpack positions (3.900+1.54). Backpack loading in most any position may require the stretching and strengthening of muscles affected by kinematic changes caused by wearing a loaded backpack.

Key concepts: Backpack, Trunk, Treadmill, Kinematics, Tilt (camera), Medicine, Anatomy, Orthodontics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
LOADED BACKPACK POSITIONS AFFECTS TRUNK POSITION DURING WALKING — Research Paper | ScholarLens