2015Obstetrical & Gynecological SurveyRequires access

The Role of Episiotomy in Prevention and Management of Shoulder Dystocia

Lena Sagi‐Dain, Shlomi Sagi

Open publisher page 35 citations

Abstract

Importance Shoulder dystocia is an obstetric emergency with potential catastrophic outcomes. Objective To perform a systematic literature review examining the effectiveness of episiotomy in the prevention and management of shoulder dystocia during vaginal birth. Evidence Acquisition Search was conducted by a research librarian in MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and SCOPUS databases using the terms “episiotomy” and “shoulder dystocia,” with no language or time restrictions. Two investigators independently selected original researches examining the effects of episiotomy on shoulder dystocia and its neonatal and maternal outcomes. Relevant articles were accessed in full text, including manual search of the references. We contacted authors of studies with insufficient or unclear data. Because of clinical and methodological diversity of the studies, meta-analysis was not performed. Results Fourteen articles met the inclusion criteria, encompassing a total of 9769 shoulder dystocia cases. Only 1 study effectively evaluated the role of episiotomy in shoulder dystocia prevention, yielding a nonsignificant result. Three articles assessed neonatal consequences of shoulder dystocia, one of them linking episiotomy to higher risk of neonatal injury. Two of the 3 studies evaluating maternal outcomes showed that episiotomy is related to increased risk of advanced perineal tears. Overall quality of evidence was rated as very low. Conclusions and Relevance Our systematic review found no evidence supporting the use of episiotomy in the prevention and management of shoulder dystocia. This observation carries major clinical and legal implications for the obstetricians. Higher-quality studies are needed to evaluate this important issue. Target Audience Obstetricians and gynecologists, family physicians Learning Objectives After completion of this educational activity, the reader will be better able to analyze the paucity of existing literature examining the role of episiotomy in the prevention and management of shoulder dystocia, discuss the crucial issues in exploring the subject including uniform definition of shoulder dystocia and the report of episiotomy timing, and assess the knowledge needed to determine whether to perform episiotomy in deliveries with increased risk of shoulder dystocia, such as in cases of macrosomic fetus.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Importance Shoulder dystocia is an obstetric emergency with potential catastrophic outcomes. Objective To perform a systematic literature review examining the effectiveness of episiotomy in the prevention and management of shoulder dystocia during vaginal birth. Evidence Acquisition Search was conducted by a research librarian in MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and SCOPUS databases using the terms “episiotomy” and “shoulder dystocia,” with no language or time restrictions. Two investigators independently selected original researches examining the effects of episiotomy on shoulder dystocia and its neonatal and maternal outcomes. Relevant articles were accessed in full text, including manual search of the references. We contacted authors of studies with insufficient or unclear data. Because of clinical and methodological diversity of the studies, meta-analysis was not performed. Results Fourteen articles met the inclusion criteria, encompassing a total of 9769 shoulder dystocia cases. Only 1 study effectively evaluated the role of episiotomy in shoulder dystocia prevention, yielding a nonsignificant result. Three articles assessed neonatal consequences of shoulder dystocia, one of them linking episiotomy to higher risk of neonatal injury. Two of the 3 studies evaluating maternal outcomes showed that episiotomy is related to increased risk of advanced perineal tears. Overall quality of evidence was rated as very low. Conclusions and Relevance Our systematic review found no evidence supporting the use of episiotomy in the prevention and management of shoulder dystocia. This observation carries major clinical and legal implications for the obstetricians. Higher-quality studies are needed to evaluate this important issue. Target Audience Obstetricians and gynecologists, family physicians Learning Objectives After completion of this educational activity, the reader will be better able to analyze the paucity of existing literature examining the role of episiotomy in the prevention and management of shoulder dystocia, discuss the crucial issues in exploring the subject including uniform definition of shoulder dystocia and the report of episiotomy timing, and assess the knowledge needed to determine whether to perform episiotomy in deliveries with increased risk of shoulder dystocia, such as in cases of macrosomic fetus.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 35 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Importance Shoulder dystocia is an obstetric emergency with potential catastrophic outcomes. Objective To perform a systematic literature review examining the effectiveness of episiotomy in the prevention and management of shoulder dystocia during vaginal birth. Evidence Acquisition Search was conducted by a research librarian in MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and SCOPUS databases using the terms “episiotomy” and “shoulder dystocia,” with no language or time restrictions. Two investigators independently selected original researches examining the effects of episiotomy on shoulder dystocia and its neonatal and maternal outcomes. Relevant articles were accessed in full text, including manual search of the references. We contacted authors of studies with insufficient or unclear data. Because of clinical and methodological diversity of the studies, meta-analysis was not performed. Results Fourteen articles met the inclusion criteria, encompassing a total of 9769 shoulder dystocia cases. Only 1 study effectively evaluated the role of episiotomy in shoulder dystocia prevention, yielding a nonsignificant result. Three articles assessed neonatal consequences of shoulder dystocia, one of them linking episiotomy to higher risk of neonatal injury. Two of the 3 studies evaluating maternal outcomes showed that episiotomy is related to increased risk of advanced perineal tears. Overall quality of evidence was rated as very low. Conclusions and Relevance Our systematic review found no evidence supporting the use of episiotomy in the prevention and management of shoulder dystocia. This observation carries major clinical and legal implications for the obstetricians. Higher-quality studies are needed to evaluate this important issue. Target Audience Obstetricians and gynecologists, family physicians Learning Objectives After completion of this educational activity, the reader will be better able to analyze the paucity of existing literature examining the role of episiotomy in the prevention and management of shoulder dystocia, discuss the crucial issues in exploring the subject including uniform definition of shoulder dystocia and the report of episiotomy timing, and assess the knowledge needed to determine whether to perform episiotomy in deliveries with increased risk of shoulder dystocia, such as in cases of macrosomic fetus.

Key concepts: Episiotomy, Shoulder dystocia, Medicine, MEDLINE, Obstetrics, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Physical therapy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Role of Episiotomy in Prevention and Management of Shoulder Dystocia — Research Paper | ScholarLens