2011European Respiratory JournalRequires access

Respiratory mechanical and cardio-vascular changes during non invasive ventilation in stable COPD patients with chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure: High intensity ventilation vs low intensity ventilation

József Lukácsovits, Annalisa Carlucci, Nicholas S. Hill, Piero Ceriana, Lara Pisani, Annia Schreiber, Paola Pierucci, András Lorx, György Losonczy, Stefano Nava

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In a subgroup of stable COPD patients with chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure (HRF) the use of conventional NPPV (Li-NPPV), can improve pulmonary function, gas exchange, and health related quality of life. High-intensity positive pressure ventilation (Hi-NPPV) with higher IPAP (28 cmH20) and respiratory rate (20/min) were recently adopted in order to achieve maximal PaCO2 reduction and has been shown to better improve diurnal blood gas during spontaneous breathing (SB), compared to Li-NPPV. NPPV can provoke alterations in intrapleural pressure and lung volume, which influence the cardio-vascular performance. Our study evaluates the respiratory mechanical (RM) and cardio-vascular (CV) effects of Li-NPPV and HI-NPPV, in 15 stable COPD patients with HRF. We measured the RM and blood gas parameters, in addition non-invasive measurement of CV parameters was performed. The data were reported as mean ±SD, and where compared with repeated measures ANOVA. Significant (sgn) increases were observed in pleural pressure, decrease in tans-diaphragmatic pressure and minute diaphragmatic pressure-time product (SB: 323±149; Li-NPPV: 132±139; Hi-NPPV: 40±69 cmH2O·s/min). The PaCO2 showed a sgn. decrease and the pH a sign. increase during either modalities of NPPV. Significant reduction were detected in arterial blood pressure, stroke volume, cardiac output (SB: 5.5±1.14; NPPV: 4,7±0.98; Hi-NPPV: 4.00±0.96 l/min) and oxygen transport. The long-term effects of this RM and CV changes are uncertain, accordingly further long-term studies are needed to determine its effect on survival.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In a subgroup of stable COPD patients with chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure (HRF) the use of conventional NPPV (Li-NPPV), can improve pulmonary function, gas exchange, and health related quality of life. High-intensity positive pressure ventilation (Hi-NPPV) with higher IPAP (28 cmH20) and respiratory rate (20/min) were recently adopted in order to achieve maximal PaCO2 reduction and has been shown to better improve diurnal blood gas during spontaneous breathing (SB), compared to Li-NPPV. NPPV can provoke alterations in intrapleural pressure and lung volume, which influence the cardio-vascular performance. Our study evaluates the respiratory mechanical (RM) and cardio-vascular (CV) effects of Li-NPPV and HI-NPPV, in 15 stable COPD patients with HRF. We measured the RM and blood gas parameters, in addition non-invasive measurement of CV parameters was performed. The data were reported as mean ±SD, and where compared with repeated measures ANOVA. Significant (sgn) increases were observed in pleural pressure, decrease in tans-diaphragmatic pressure and minute diaphragmatic pressure-time product (SB: 323±149; Li-NPPV: 132±139; Hi-NPPV: 40±69 cmH2O·s/min). The PaCO2 showed a sgn. decrease and the pH a sign. increase during either modalities of NPPV. Significant reduction were detected in arterial blood pressure, stroke volume, cardiac output (SB: 5.5±1.14; NPPV: 4,7±0.98; Hi-NPPV: 4.00±0.96 l/min) and oxygen transport. The long-term effects of this RM and CV changes are uncertain, accordingly further long-term studies are needed to determine its effect on survival.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In a subgroup of stable COPD patients with chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure (HRF) the use of conventional NPPV (Li-NPPV), can improve pulmonary function, gas exchange, and health related quality of life. High-intensity positive pressure ventilation (Hi-NPPV) with higher IPAP (28 cmH20) and respiratory rate (20/min) were recently adopted in order to achieve maximal PaCO2 reduction and has been shown to better improve diurnal blood gas during spontaneous breathing (SB), compared to Li-NPPV. NPPV can provoke alterations in intrapleural pressure and lung volume, which influence the cardio-vascular performance. Our study evaluates the respiratory mechanical (RM) and cardio-vascular (CV) effects of Li-NPPV and HI-NPPV, in 15 stable COPD patients with HRF. We measured the RM and blood gas parameters, in addition non-invasive measurement of CV parameters was performed. The data were reported as mean ±SD, and where compared with repeated measures ANOVA. Significant (sgn) increases were observed in pleural pressure, decrease in tans-diaphragmatic pressure and minute diaphragmatic pressure-time product (SB: 323±149; Li-NPPV: 132±139; Hi-NPPV: 40±69 cmH2O·s/min). The PaCO2 showed a sgn. decrease and the pH a sign. increase during either modalities of NPPV. Significant reduction were detected in arterial blood pressure, stroke volume, cardiac output (SB: 5.5±1.14; NPPV: 4,7±0.98; Hi-NPPV: 4.00±0.96 l/min) and oxygen transport. The long-term effects of this RM and CV changes are uncertain, accordingly further long-term studies are needed to determine its effect on survival.

Key concepts: Medicine, COPD, Ventilation (architecture), Respiratory system, Anesthesia, Cardiology, Respiratory minute volume, Respiratory rate

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Respiratory mechanical and cardio-vascular changes during non invasive ventilation in stable COPD patients with chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure: High intensity ventilation vs low intensity ventilation — Research Paper | ScholarLens