2007CABI eBooksRequires access

Ethics on the frontiers of livestock science.

Paul Β. Thompson

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

Philosophers have tended to emphasize reductive approaches to rights, virtues and consequences, resulting in the 20th century in two dominant theories, utilitarianism and rights theory. These approaches are well represented in contemporary animal ethics, but are not easily adaptable for livestock science. In particular, the key problems associated with rDNA-based animal transformation are not well articulated by either of these approaches. The most natural way to articulate these issues is through an ethical approach that stresses virtue, but neither utilitarian nor rights theories are capable of accommodating a virtues approach. A more pragmatic style in ethics is introduced as a way to accommodate a pluralism of values in animal ethics, and a pragmatic approach is discussed for topics at the cutting edge of livestock science.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Philosophers have tended to emphasize reductive approaches to rights, virtues and consequences, resulting in the 20th century in two dominant theories, utilitarianism and rights theory. These approaches are well represented in contemporary animal ethics, but are not easily adaptable for livestock science. In particular, the key problems associated with rDNA-based animal transformation are not well articulated by either of these approaches. The most natural way to articulate these issues is through an ethical approach that stresses virtue, but neither utilitarian nor rights theories are capable of accommodating a virtues approach. A more pragmatic style in ethics is introduced as a way to accommodate a pluralism of values in animal ethics, and a pragmatic approach is discussed for topics at the cutting edge of livestock science.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Philosophers have tended to emphasize reductive approaches to rights, virtues and consequences, resulting in the 20th century in two dominant theories, utilitarianism and rights theory. These approaches are well represented in contemporary animal ethics, but are not easily adaptable for livestock science. In particular, the key problems associated with rDNA-based animal transformation are not well articulated by either of these approaches. The most natural way to articulate these issues is through an ethical approach that stresses virtue, but neither utilitarian nor rights theories are capable of accommodating a virtues approach. A more pragmatic style in ethics is introduced as a way to accommodate a pluralism of values in animal ethics, and a pragmatic approach is discussed for topics at the cutting edge of livestock science.

Key concepts: Utilitarianism, Pluralism (philosophy), Animal ethics, Virtue ethics, Environmental ethics, Livestock, Animal rights, Natural (archaeology)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Ethics on the frontiers of livestock science. — Research Paper | ScholarLens