2012Oxford University Press eBooksRequires access

To What Extent can the European Union Deliver “Social Citizenship” to its Citizens?

Jean‐Claude Barbier

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

T. H. Marshall’s view of citizenship had little to do with what, in 1992, the Maastricht Treaty was to call “EU citizenship.” For all the normative enthusiasm for presumed “postnational” Europe and despite far-reaching Europeanization, access to social protection has, since the Treaty of Rome, remained firmly national. Limited positive integration has been the rule, against a background of a powerful negative integration—that is, the discarding of legal and other obstacles brought about by the systematic introduction of mechanisms aimed at promoting unrestricted competition. The main exception in terms of significant European influence on social and labor rights has been equality between men and women, because of the unexpected spillover effects of the initial provisions in the Treaty of Rome: this could change with a more extensive application of the Charter of Fundamental Rights in the future, but it is unlikely.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

T. H. Marshall’s view of citizenship had little to do with what, in 1992, the Maastricht Treaty was to call “EU citizenship.” For all the normative enthusiasm for presumed “postnational” Europe and despite far-reaching Europeanization, access to social protection has, since the Treaty of Rome, remained firmly national. Limited positive integration has been the rule, against a background of a powerful negative integration—that is, the discarding of legal and other obstacles brought about by the systematic introduction of mechanisms aimed at promoting unrestricted competition. The main exception in terms of significant European influence on social and labor rights has been equality between men and women, because of the unexpected spillover effects of the initial provisions in the Treaty of Rome: this could change with a more extensive application of the Charter of Fundamental Rights in the future, but it is unlikely.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

T. H. Marshall’s view of citizenship had little to do with what, in 1992, the Maastricht Treaty was to call “EU citizenship.” For all the normative enthusiasm for presumed “postnational” Europe and despite far-reaching Europeanization, access to social protection has, since the Treaty of Rome, remained firmly national. Limited positive integration has been the rule, against a background of a powerful negative integration—that is, the discarding of legal and other obstacles brought about by the systematic introduction of mechanisms aimed at promoting unrestricted competition. The main exception in terms of significant European influence on social and labor rights has been equality between men and women, because of the unexpected spillover effects of the initial provisions in the Treaty of Rome: this could change with a more extensive application of the Charter of Fundamental Rights in the future, but it is unlikely.

Key concepts: Citizenship, Solidarity, Rhetoric, Politics, Political science, Character (mathematics), European union, Social citizenship

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
To What Extent can the European Union Deliver “Social Citizenship” to its Citizens? — Research Paper | ScholarLens