2015Unpublished venueRequires access

A Practical Drilling Riser and Wellhead Vortex Induced Vibration Fatigue Comparison Between Analysis and Field Measured Data

Michael Long Ge, Jomon Kannala, D. Cain, Elizbar Buba Kebadze, Shankar Sundararaman, Carlyn Krapf, Zhen Li

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

In order to design a drilling riser system that meets the operational requirements, it is industry practice to use analytical tools to predict the riser and wellhead fatigue damage. This paper focuses on the comparison between the analysis and field measurements for both the drilling riser and wellhead vortex induced vibration (VIV) fatigue damage, during a recent loop current event in the Gulf of Mexico. The field data, which includes the drilling riser configuration, riser tensioner setting, and loop current data, were considered in this comparison. As one of the key contributors to VIV fatigue, the loop current, was measured from a survey vessel in the field during the blowout preventer (BOP) latched and retrieval period. The analysis utilized the VIV program SHEAR7 V4.6 to calculate the fatigue damage for both the drilling riser and wellhead system. The field measured acceleration data from the installed monitoring system was converted to the fatigue damage by transfer function methods. Key findings and conclusions are summarized to improve future analysis predictions of drilling riser and wellhead fatigue damage.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In order to design a drilling riser system that meets the operational requirements, it is industry practice to use analytical tools to predict the riser and wellhead fatigue damage. This paper focuses on the comparison between the analysis and field measurements for both the drilling riser and wellhead vortex induced vibration (VIV) fatigue damage, during a recent loop current event in the Gulf of Mexico. The field data, which includes the drilling riser configuration, riser tensioner setting, and loop current data, were considered in this comparison. As one of the key contributors to VIV fatigue, the loop current, was measured from a survey vessel in the field during the blowout preventer (BOP) latched and retrieval period. The analysis utilized the VIV program SHEAR7 V4.6 to calculate the fatigue damage for both the drilling riser and wellhead system. The field measured acceleration data from the installed monitoring system was converted to the fatigue damage by transfer function methods. Key findings and conclusions are summarized to improve future analysis predictions of drilling riser and wellhead fatigue damage.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In order to design a drilling riser system that meets the operational requirements, it is industry practice to use analytical tools to predict the riser and wellhead fatigue damage. This paper focuses on the comparison between the analysis and field measurements for both the drilling riser and wellhead vortex induced vibration (VIV) fatigue damage, during a recent loop current event in the Gulf of Mexico. The field data, which includes the drilling riser configuration, riser tensioner setting, and loop current data, were considered in this comparison. As one of the key contributors to VIV fatigue, the loop current, was measured from a survey vessel in the field during the blowout preventer (BOP) latched and retrieval period. The analysis utilized the VIV program SHEAR7 V4.6 to calculate the fatigue damage for both the drilling riser and wellhead system. The field measured acceleration data from the installed monitoring system was converted to the fatigue damage by transfer function methods. Key findings and conclusions are summarized to improve future analysis predictions of drilling riser and wellhead fatigue damage.

Key concepts: Wellhead, Drilling riser, Drilling, Marine engineering, Vibration, Acceleration, Engineering, Structural engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Practical Drilling Riser and Wellhead Vortex Induced Vibration Fatigue Comparison Between Analysis and Field Measured Data — Research Paper | ScholarLens