2014Unpublished venueRequires access

Editorial : China - Picking up Threads from a Strong Tradition of Scholarship

Gauhar Raza

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

When Joseph Needham started looking at the development of science and technology in China, for most western scholars, it was still ‘the barbaric oriental enigma’. He asked a simple question, ‘what were the inhibiting factors that prevented the rise of modern science in the Chinese civilisation?’ The pursuit resulted in a monumental work on Chinese contribution to the pool of human knowledge. Needham’s painstaking work, which runs into seven volumes and 27 books reintroduced China to other civilizations in general and to the western world in parti-cular. As opposed to prevailing understanding, Needham’s China was scientifically rich and technologically mature. The obser-vations about Chinese as well as about Indian civilization made in the nineteenth century, continued to blur the vision of scholars through the first half of the twentieth century, even after the detailed work of Needham. It took time to correct the academic myopia.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

When Joseph Needham started looking at the development of science and technology in China, for most western scholars, it was still ‘the barbaric oriental enigma’. He asked a simple question, ‘what were the inhibiting factors that prevented the rise of modern science in the Chinese civilisation?’ The pursuit resulted in a monumental work on Chinese contribution to the pool of human knowledge. Needham’s painstaking work, which runs into seven volumes and 27 books reintroduced China to other civilizations in general and to the western world in parti-cular. As opposed to prevailing understanding, Needham’s China was scientifically rich and technologically mature. The obser-vations about Chinese as well as about Indian civilization made in the nineteenth century, continued to blur the vision of scholars through the first half of the twentieth century, even after the detailed work of Needham. It took time to correct the academic myopia.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

When Joseph Needham started looking at the development of science and technology in China, for most western scholars, it was still ‘the barbaric oriental enigma’. He asked a simple question, ‘what were the inhibiting factors that prevented the rise of modern science in the Chinese civilisation?’ The pursuit resulted in a monumental work on Chinese contribution to the pool of human knowledge. Needham’s painstaking work, which runs into seven volumes and 27 books reintroduced China to other civilizations in general and to the western world in parti-cular. As opposed to prevailing understanding, Needham’s China was scientifically rich and technologically mature. The obser-vations about Chinese as well as about Indian civilization made in the nineteenth century, continued to blur the vision of scholars through the first half of the twentieth century, even after the detailed work of Needham. It took time to correct the academic myopia.

Key concepts: China, Civilization, Scholarship, History, Western culture, Ancient history, Political science, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Editorial : China - Picking up Threads from a Strong Tradition of Scholarship — Research Paper | ScholarLens