1986Unpublished venueRequires access

Fire and chaparral management at the chaparral/urban interface

Philip J. Riggan, Scott B. Franklin, James A. Brass

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

large or fast-moving, nor was it a disaster for the native chaparral ecosystem. Yet it was disastrous for residents of the area, a consequence of unrestricted urban development in the chaparral of Southern California. Its costs included human suffering and financial loss from the destruction of 484 of 2,300 homes. Since that time fire-fighting techniques have improved and ordinances have been enacted to increase clearance around structures and to encourage the use of non-flammable roofing materials. Yet within the origi-nal fire perimeter there are now 3,500 structures of aver-age value greater than $1.3 million, and the chaparral has flourished to the point where it can spread a destruc-tive fire once more. Another disaster is in the making. Chaparral is adapted to recurrent fire, and burning,

About this research paper

What this paper is about

large or fast-moving, nor was it a disaster for the native chaparral ecosystem. Yet it was disastrous for residents of the area, a consequence of unrestricted urban development in the chaparral of Southern California. Its costs included human suffering and financial loss from the destruction of 484 of 2,300 homes. Since that time fire-fighting techniques have improved and ordinances have been enacted to increase clearance around structures and to encourage the use of non-flammable roofing materials. Yet within the origi-nal fire perimeter there are now 3,500 structures of aver-age value greater than $1.3 million, and the chaparral has flourished to the point where it can spread a destruc-tive fire once more. Another disaster is in the making. Chaparral is adapted to recurrent fire, and burning,

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

large or fast-moving, nor was it a disaster for the native chaparral ecosystem. Yet it was disastrous for residents of the area, a consequence of unrestricted urban development in the chaparral of Southern California. Its costs included human suffering and financial loss from the destruction of 484 of 2,300 homes. Since that time fire-fighting techniques have improved and ordinances have been enacted to increase clearance around structures and to encourage the use of non-flammable roofing materials. Yet within the origi-nal fire perimeter there are now 3,500 structures of aver-age value greater than $1.3 million, and the chaparral has flourished to the point where it can spread a destruc-tive fire once more. Another disaster is in the making. Chaparral is adapted to recurrent fire, and burning,

Key concepts: Chaparral, Geography, Ecosystem, Fire regime, Wildland–urban interface, Environmental protection, Agroforestry, Environmental planning

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Fire and chaparral management at the chaparral/urban interface — Research Paper | ScholarLens