2009Unpublished venueRequires access

Commentary On Vallejo

Rachel Singpurwalla

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

In his rich and suggestive chapter, Alvaro Vallejo argues for the novel thesis that Plato posits a form of pleasure in the Republic and the Philebus . Vallejo argues that the notion of a Platonic form of pleasure best explains other things that Plato says about pleasure. Plato draws a distinction between true pleasure and the appearance of pleasure. Plato uses the same language to describe the relationship between forms and their inferior instantiations as he uses to describe the relationship between true and false pleasures. In these comments, the author argues that we do not need to posit a form of pleasure to explain these features of the text. The chapter explains that on Vallejo's account of the form of pleasure, the form could not do the job required of it, namely, it could not explain the problem with false pleasures. Keywords: Alvaro Vallejo; Plato; pleasure

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In his rich and suggestive chapter, Alvaro Vallejo argues for the novel thesis that Plato posits a form of pleasure in the Republic and the Philebus . Vallejo argues that the notion of a Platonic form of pleasure best explains other things that Plato says about pleasure. Plato draws a distinction between true pleasure and the appearance of pleasure. Plato uses the same language to describe the relationship between forms and their inferior instantiations as he uses to describe the relationship between true and false pleasures. In these comments, the author argues that we do not need to posit a form of pleasure to explain these features of the text. The chapter explains that on Vallejo's account of the form of pleasure, the form could not do the job required of it, namely, it could not explain the problem with false pleasures. Keywords: Alvaro Vallejo; Plato; pleasure

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In his rich and suggestive chapter, Alvaro Vallejo argues for the novel thesis that Plato posits a form of pleasure in the Republic and the Philebus . Vallejo argues that the notion of a Platonic form of pleasure best explains other things that Plato says about pleasure. Plato draws a distinction between true pleasure and the appearance of pleasure. Plato uses the same language to describe the relationship between forms and their inferior instantiations as he uses to describe the relationship between true and false pleasures. In these comments, the author argues that we do not need to posit a form of pleasure to explain these features of the text. The chapter explains that on Vallejo's account of the form of pleasure, the form could not do the job required of it, namely, it could not explain the problem with false pleasures. Keywords: Alvaro Vallejo; Plato; pleasure

Key concepts: Pleasure, Philosophy, Pain and pleasure, Literature, Aesthetics, Art, Psychology, Neuroscience

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Commentary On Vallejo — Research Paper | ScholarLens