MEASURING PRESIDENTIAL POWER IN POST-SOVIET COUNTRIES
Elgun A. Taghiyev
Abstract
Elgun A. Taghiyev
Abstract
Many scholars write about democracy and democratization as a desired outcome of state-building, but few analyze authoritarianism. By contrast, this paper focuses primarily on authoritarian tendencies stretching over post-Soviet area. Having reviewed previous methodologies of measuring constitutional presidential power, the current research develops a new method sensitive to post-Soviet realities. The study also illustrates the relationship between presidentialism and authoritarianism and argues in favor of restricting presidential powers as hindering democratization.
OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Many scholars write about democracy and democratization as a desired outcome of state-building, but few analyze authoritarianism. By contrast, this paper focuses primarily on authoritarian tendencies stretching over post-Soviet area. Having reviewed previous methodologies of measuring constitutional presidential power, the current research develops a new method sensitive to post-Soviet realities. The study also illustrates the relationship between presidentialism and authoritarianism and argues in favor of restricting presidential powers as hindering democratization.
Key concepts: Democratization, Authoritarianism, Presidential system, Political science, Power (physics), Democracy, Political economy, Economic system