2015•Unpublished venueRequires access

MEASURING PRESIDENTIAL POWER IN POST-SOVIET COUNTRIES

Elgun A. Taghiyev

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

Many scholars write about democracy and democratization as a desired outcome of state-building, but few analyze authoritarianism. By contrast, this paper focuses primarily on authoritarian tendencies stretching over post-Soviet area. Having reviewed previous methodologies of measuring constitutional presidential power, the current research develops a new method sensitive to post-Soviet realities. The study also illustrates the relationship between presidentialism and authoritarianism and argues in favor of restricting presidential powers as hindering democratization.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Many scholars write about democracy and democratization as a desired outcome of state-building, but few analyze authoritarianism. By contrast, this paper focuses primarily on authoritarian tendencies stretching over post-Soviet area. Having reviewed previous methodologies of measuring constitutional presidential power, the current research develops a new method sensitive to post-Soviet realities. The study also illustrates the relationship between presidentialism and authoritarianism and argues in favor of restricting presidential powers as hindering democratization.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Many scholars write about democracy and democratization as a desired outcome of state-building, but few analyze authoritarianism. By contrast, this paper focuses primarily on authoritarian tendencies stretching over post-Soviet area. Having reviewed previous methodologies of measuring constitutional presidential power, the current research develops a new method sensitive to post-Soviet realities. The study also illustrates the relationship between presidentialism and authoritarianism and argues in favor of restricting presidential powers as hindering democratization.

Key concepts: Democratization, Authoritarianism, Presidential system, Political science, Power (physics), Democracy, Political economy, Economic system

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
MEASURING PRESIDENTIAL POWER IN POST-SOVIET COUNTRIES — Research Paper | ScholarLens