2013Unpublished venueRequires access

Performance Evaluation of Ad-hoc Routing Protocols

Madhav M. Chandane, Sunil G. Bhirud, Sanjiv Vedu Bonde

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

A wireless ad hoc network is a decentralized wireless network. The network is ad hoc because it does not rely on a preexisting infrastructure, such as routers in wired networks or access points in managed (infrastructure) wireless networks. Instead, each node participates in routing by forwarding data for other nodes, and so the determination of which nodes forward data is made dynamically based on the network connectivity. Routing protocols plays the important role for the resource requirement for routing. Mobility and scalability has become the crucial parameters for today's ad-hoc network.Objective of this paper is to study various ad-hoc routing protocols and evaluate their performance in terms of scalability and mobility using various performance metrics such as packet loss, throughput, and jitter so as to decide the usability of these protocols. The protocols under comparison are Ad-hoc On-demand Distance Vector Protocol (AODV), Destination Sequence Distance Vector Protocol (DSDV) and Dynamic Source Routing Protocol (DSR). Result shows that AODV performas better than the other two protocols with varying number of nodes and mobility.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A wireless ad hoc network is a decentralized wireless network. The network is ad hoc because it does not rely on a preexisting infrastructure, such as routers in wired networks or access points in managed (infrastructure) wireless networks. Instead, each node participates in routing by forwarding data for other nodes, and so the determination of which nodes forward data is made dynamically based on the network connectivity. Routing protocols plays the important role for the resource requirement for routing. Mobility and scalability has become the crucial parameters for today's ad-hoc network.Objective of this paper is to study various ad-hoc routing protocols and evaluate their performance in terms of scalability and mobility using various performance metrics such as packet loss, throughput, and jitter so as to decide the usability of these protocols. The protocols under comparison are Ad-hoc On-demand Distance Vector Protocol (AODV), Destination Sequence Distance Vector Protocol (DSDV) and Dynamic Source Routing Protocol (DSR). Result shows that AODV performas better than the other two protocols with varying number of nodes and mobility.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A wireless ad hoc network is a decentralized wireless network. The network is ad hoc because it does not rely on a preexisting infrastructure, such as routers in wired networks or access points in managed (infrastructure) wireless networks. Instead, each node participates in routing by forwarding data for other nodes, and so the determination of which nodes forward data is made dynamically based on the network connectivity. Routing protocols plays the important role for the resource requirement for routing. Mobility and scalability has become the crucial parameters for today's ad-hoc network.Objective of this paper is to study various ad-hoc routing protocols and evaluate their performance in terms of scalability and mobility using various performance metrics such as packet loss, throughput, and jitter so as to decide the usability of these protocols. The protocols under comparison are Ad-hoc On-demand Distance Vector Protocol (AODV), Destination Sequence Distance Vector Protocol (DSDV) and Dynamic Source Routing Protocol (DSR). Result shows that AODV performas better than the other two protocols with varying number of nodes and mobility.

Key concepts: Computer network, Computer science, Wireless Routing Protocol, Optimized Link State Routing Protocol, Dynamic Source Routing, Destination-Sequenced Distance Vector routing, Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector Routing, Ad hoc wireless distribution service

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Performance Evaluation of Ad-hoc Routing Protocols — Research Paper | ScholarLens